VYM vs VTI: High Dividend vs Total Market

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF. Should you focus on dividend income or total market diversification?

VYM

VYM

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

3.05%
Dividend Yield
0.06%
Expense Ratio
10.1%
10-Year Return
447
Holdings

VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, focusing on U.S. companies with above-average dividend yields. Screens for sustainable dividend payments with market-cap weighting. Provides diversified exposure to value-oriented, income-producing companies.

High Dividend Yield Value Focus Ultra Low Cost Diversified Income Strategy
VTI

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

1.45%
Dividend Yield
0.03%
Expense Ratio
11.8%
10-Year Return
3,740
Holdings

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index, providing exposure to the entire U.S. stock market. Includes large, mid, small, and micro-cap stocks across all sectors. Represents the broadest possible diversification within U.S. equities.

Total Market Ultra Diversified Extremely Low Cost All Market Caps Core Holding

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric VYM VTI Winner
Dividend Yield 3.05% 1.45% VYM (+1.60%)
Expense Ratio 0.06% 0.03% VTI (-0.03%)
10-Year Annual Return 10.1% 11.8% VTI (+1.7%)
Number of Holdings 447 3,740 VTI (8.4x more)
Assets Under Management $58.2B $380.5B VTI
P/E Ratio 15.2 21.8 VYM (cheaper)
Price/Book Ratio 2.8 4.1 VYM (cheaper)
Beta vs S&P 500 0.82 1.00 VYM (lower risk)

Performance Comparison

VYM Performance

Higher dividend yield with lower total returns. Concentrated in value sectors. More defensive characteristics. Lower volatility during market downturns. Outperforms during value/income-focused markets. Underperforms during growth/tech leadership.

10.1%
10-Year Return
3.05%
Yield
0.82
Beta
447
Holdings

VTI Performance

Lower yield with higher total returns. Complete market representation. Captures growth from all sectors and sizes. Higher long-term returns due to growth exposure. More volatile but better absolute returns. Perfect benchmark for U.S. equity performance.

11.8%
10-Year Return
1.45%
Yield
1.00
Beta
3,740
Holdings

Strategy Analysis

VYM Approach

High dividend yield income strategy:

  • Tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index
  • Focus on above-average dividend yield companies
  • Screens for sustainable dividend payments
  • Market-cap weighted methodology
  • Value and income-oriented
  • Heavy financials and utilities exposure
  • Lower growth, higher income focus
  • Defensive positioning

VTI Approach

Total market core holding strategy:

  • Tracks CRSP US Total Market Index
  • Complete U.S. stock market coverage
  • Includes all market caps (large to micro)
  • Market-cap weighted methodology
  • No style or sector bias
  • Pure market representation
  • Maximum diversification
  • Ultimate core holding

Portfolio Construction & Weighting Differences

VYM's value focus creates dramatically different sector exposure compared to VTI's market representation.

Sector Construction

VYM: Heavy financials (23%), healthcare (14%), consumer staples (13%)

VTI: Technology (28%), healthcare (13%), financials (11%)

Tech Exposure: VYM 8% vs VTI 28%

Value Tilt: VYM extreme, VTI neutral

Market Cap Distribution

VYM: 100% large-cap (no mid/small)

VTI: 71% large, 19% mid, 10% small/micro

Small-Cap Exposure: VYM 0% vs VTI 10%

Growth Exposure: VYM limited, VTI complete

Concentration & Diversification

Top 10 Holdings %: VYM 22% vs VTI 25%

Industry Diversification: VYM 8x less diversified

Company Count: VYM 447 vs VTI 3,740

Style Consistency: VYM value-only, VTI style-neutral

Diversification & Risk Management Comparison

VTI offers vastly superior diversification across companies, sectors, and market caps.

Company Diversification

447 vs 3,740
VYM vs VTI Holdings

Market Cap Coverage

1 vs 4
VYM (large) vs VTI (all) Categories

Sector Concentration

3x vs 0.3x
VYM vs VTI (vs market)

Single-Stock Risk

Higher vs Minimal
VYM vs VTI

Risk & Volatility Characteristics

VYM's defensive positioning provides lower volatility but misses growth opportunities.

Volatility Metrics

Standard Deviation: VYM 14.2% vs VTI 15.8%

Maximum Drawdown (2020): VYM -34% vs VTI -37%

Beta: VYM 0.82 vs VTI 1.00

Downside Capture: VYM 88% vs VTI 100%

Risk-Adjusted Returns

Sharpe Ratio: VYM 0.65 vs VTI 0.72

Sortino Ratio: VYM 0.92 vs VTI 1.05

Calmar Ratio: VYM 0.30 vs VTI 0.32

Alpha: VYM -1.2% vs VTI 0.0%

Market Cycle Performance

Growth Markets: VYM underperforms significantly

Value Markets: VYM outperforms meaningfully

Bear Markets: VYM declines less

Recovery Speed: VTI typically faster

Sector Allocation Comparison

Sector Weighting Differences

VYM's dividend focus creates massive overweights in financials and underweights in technology compared to VTI's market representation.

Financials

23% vs 11%
VYM vs VTI

Technology

8% vs 28%
VYM vs VTI

Healthcare

14% vs 13%
VYM vs VTI

Consumer Staples

13% vs 6%
VYM vs VTI

Energy

7% vs 4%
VYM vs VTI

Utilities

6% vs 2%
VYM vs VTI

Income Analysis

VYM Income Profile

High current yield with modest dividend growth. Value-oriented companies with established dividend payments. Heavy financials and utilities provide stable income. Lower payout ratios than typical high-yield funds. Good inflation protection through dividend growth.

Current Yield 3.05%
5-Year Dividend Growth 6.2%
Payout Ratio 52%
Income Stability High

VTI Income Profile

Modest current yield with solid growth potential. Broad diversification includes dividend growers across all sectors. Technology growth fuels long-term dividend increases. More cyclical but higher growth potential. Dividend growth typically exceeds inflation.

Current Yield 1.45%
5-Year Dividend Growth 7.8%
Payout Ratio 38%
Growth Potential Excellent

Historical Performance & Backtesting

Long-Term Performance Comparison

VTI has significantly outperformed VYM over long periods due to technology/growth leadership, despite VYM's higher yield.

Since 2006 (VYM inception)

8.9% vs 10.2%
VYM vs VTI Annualized

Maximum Drawdown (2008)

-53% vs -55%
VYM vs VTI

Sharpe Ratio (10-Year)

0.65 vs 0.72
VYM vs VTI

Dividend Growth (10-Year)

6.2% vs 7.8%
VYM vs VTI CAGR

Top Holdings Comparison

VYM Top Holdings (High Dividend Yield)

JPMorgan Chase (Financials) 4.8%
Johnson & Johnson (Healthcare) 3.9%
Procter & Gamble (Staples) 3.5%
Exxon Mobil (Energy) 3.2%
Verizon Communications (Telecom) 2.9%

Note: Value-heavy, financials dominant, 447 holdings, high yield focus

VTI Top Holdings (Total Market)

Microsoft Corp. (Technology) 6.2%
Apple Inc. (Technology) 5.8%
NVIDIA Corp. (Technology) 4.1%
Amazon.com (Consumer) 3.5%
Meta Platforms (Technology) 2.3%

Note: Growth-heavy, tech dominant, 3,740 holdings, market representation

Investment Recommendation

💰 Choose VYM If:

  • High current income is primary objective (3.05% vs 1.45%)
  • You prefer value-oriented, defensive positioning
  • Lower volatility and beta appeal to you
  • You want exposure to financials and utilities
  • Dividend stability is more important than growth
  • You're in or near retirement needing income
  • You believe value will outperform growth
  • You want lower market correlation

📈 Choose VTI If:

  • Maximum diversification is priority (3,740 vs 447 holdings)
  • Long-term capital growth is primary goal
  • You want complete U.S. market exposure
  • Technology and growth exposure is important
  • You prefer market-neutral, style-agnostic approach
  • You're building a core portfolio position
  • Ultra-low expense ratio matters (0.03% vs 0.06%)
  • You want simplest possible "buy the market" solution

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For maximum income focus: Use VYM as core (70-80%) with VTI satellite (20-30%) for growth/diversification. For balanced approach: 60% VTI + 40% VYM provides ~2.15% blended yield with better growth potential. For core-satellite strategy: Use VTI as core (80%) with VYM satellite (20%) for income boost. Important: VTI's 0.03% expense ratio vs VYM's 0.06% provides slight cost advantage. VYM's 100% large-cap vs VTI's all-cap creates different risk exposures. During growth/tech leadership, VTI significantly outperforms. During value/rate-sensitive markets, VYM outperforms. Consider combining with international: 50% VTI + 30% VXUS + 20% VYM provides global diversification with income tilt. For retirement portfolios: 40% VTI + 30% VYM + 20% BND + 10% VXUS balances growth, income, and stability.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: VYM vs VTI?

VYM
Choose VYM if you want a higher current yield than SCHD from a very broad basket of large-cap U.S. payers.
VTI
Choose VTI if you want the entire U.S. market — large, mid and small caps — in a single low-cost fund.
Bottom line: VYM maximises current dividend income, while VTI prioritises total return and diversification with a lower yield. Income seekers lean VYM; long-term growth investors lean VTI.