VYM vs VIG: High Yield vs Dividend Appreciation

Two Vanguard dividend strategies: High current income vs quality dividend growth. Which suits your investment goals better?

VYM

VYM

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

3.1%
Dividend Yield
0.06%
Expense Ratio
10.8%
5-Year Return
450+
Holdings

VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, selecting US companies with above-average dividend yields. Focuses on current income generation with broad diversification. No specific quality or growth requirements beyond yield.

High Yield Current Income Broad Diversification Low-Cost Value Focused
VIG

VIG

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF

1.8%
Dividend Yield
0.06%
Expense Ratio
12.5%
5-Year Return
310
Holdings

VIG tracks the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index, requiring 10+ consecutive years of dividend increases. Emphasizes dividend growth and quality over current yield. Lower yield but higher growth and total returns.

Dividend Growth Quality Focus 10+ Year Track Record Growth Oriented Low-Cost

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric VYM VIG Winner
Dividend Yield 3.1% 1.8% VYM (+1.3%)
Expense Ratio 0.06% 0.06% Tie
5-Year Annual Return 10.8% 12.5% VIG (+1.7%)
Dividend Growth (5-Year) 5.2% 8.5% VIG (+3.3%)
Number of Holdings 450+ 310 VYM (More Diversified)
Assets Under Management $56.3B $74.2B VIG
Minimum Dividend History None 10+ Years VIG (Quality)
Beta vs S&P 500 0.88 0.82 VIG (Lower Risk)

Performance Comparison

VYM Performance

Higher current income but lower total returns. More cyclical exposure leads to higher volatility during downturns. Outperforms during value rallies and when interest rates are low. Better for income-focused investors.

10.8%
5-Year Return
3.1%
Yield
5.2%
Div Growth
0.88
Beta

VIG Performance

Lower current income but higher total returns and dividend growth. More defensive characteristics with lower beta. Outperforms during growth phases and market recoveries. Better for long-term growth investors.

12.5%
5-Year Return
1.8%
Yield
8.5%
Div Growth
0.82
Beta

Strategy Analysis

VYM Approach

Current income focus:

  • FTSE High Dividend Yield Index
  • Above-average dividend yield companies
  • No minimum dividend growth requirement
  • No quality screens beyond index inclusion
  • Market-cap weighted
  • Value-oriented portfolio
  • Current income optimization
  • Broad diversification (450+ holdings)

VIG Approach

Dividend growth focus:

  • NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index
  • Minimum 10+ years dividend increases
  • Dividend growth and quality emphasis
  • Quality screens for financial health
  • Market-cap weighted
  • Growth-oriented dividend payers
  • Future income growth optimization
  • Moderate diversification (310 holdings)

Income vs Growth Tradeoff

VYM offers 72% higher current yield (3.1% vs 1.8%) but 35% lower dividend growth (5.2% vs 8.5%). VIG sacrifices current income for higher future income growth and total returns.

Yield Advantage

+1.3%
VYM Yield Premium

Growth Advantage

+3.3%
VIG Growth Premium

Crossover Point

~9 Years
VIG Catches VYM Income

10-Year Projection

VIG +20%
Higher Total Income

Quality Comparison

VIG's 10+ year dividend growth requirement results in higher quality portfolio. VYM includes some high-yield companies with questionable sustainability.

VIG Quality Advantages

10+ year track record: Proven dividend growers

Financial stability: Survived multiple cycles

Lower payout ratios: More sustainable dividends

Business durability: Industry leaders with moats

VYM Quality Concerns

No growth requirement: Includes stagnant dividends

Higher payout ratios: Some unsustainable yields

Yield traps: Companies cutting risk

Cyclical exposure: More economic sensitivity

Historical Stress Test

2008 Crisis: VIG -32% vs VYM -38%

2020 Crash: VIG -20% vs VYM -25%

Dividend cuts 2020: VIG 3% vs VYM 8%

Recovery speed: VIG faster post-crisis

Tax Efficiency Analysis

Tax Implications

Both are Vanguard ETFs with excellent tax efficiency, but VYM's higher yield generates more taxable income. VIG may be more tax-efficient for taxable accounts.

Qualified Dividends

~85%
Both ETFs Similar

Tax Cost Ratio

0.45% vs 0.25%
VYM vs VIG

Capital Gains

Minimal
Both ETFs Low

Taxable Income

+72% More
VYM vs VIG

Vanguard Family Considerations

Both ETFs benefit from Vanguard's unique structure (ETF share class of mutual fund) that enhances tax efficiency through heartbeat trades.

Structure Advantage

ETF share class: Both are share classes of mutual funds

Heartbeat trades: Tax-efficient capital gains management

In-kind creations: Minimizes taxable events

Vanguard patent: Unique tax advantage until 2023

Cost Advantage

0.06% expense ratio: Among lowest in category

Scale benefits: $130B+ combined assets

Tracking efficiency: Minimal tracking error

Bid-ask spreads: Tight due to high liquidity

Account Placement

Taxable accounts: VIG may be better (lower yield)

Tax-deferred accounts: Either works well

Tax-free accounts: VYM better (higher yield)

Overall: Both excellent Vanguard low-cost options

Income Analysis

VYM Income Profile

Higher current income but slower growth. More sensitive to interest rate changes. Includes higher-yielding but potentially riskier companies. Better for investors needing maximum current income now.

Current Yield 3.1%
5-Year Dividend Growth 5.2%
10-Year Projected Yield ~5.1%
Income Stability Medium

VIG Income Profile

Lower current income but faster growth. More predictable dividend increases. Higher quality companies with sustainable payout ratios. Better for investors focused on future income growth.

Current Yield 1.8%
5-Year Dividend Growth 8.5%
10-Year Projected Yield ~4.1%
Income Stability High

Sector Allocation Comparison

VYM Sectors (Value & Yield Focused)

Financials 21.5%
Healthcare 16.2%
Consumer Staples 14.8%
Information Technology 11.2%
Energy 9.5%

VIG Sectors (Growth & Quality Focused)

Information Technology 24.3%
Industrials 18.5%
Healthcare 16.8%
Consumer Staples 14.2%
Financials 10.5%

Top Holdings Comparison

VYM Top Holdings (High Yield Focus)

JPMorgan Chase & Co. 3.8%
Johnson & Johnson 3.5%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 3.2%
Procter & Gamble Co. 2.8%
Verizon Communications 2.5%

Note: More financials, energy, telecom for yield

VIG Top Holdings (Growth Focus)

Microsoft Corp. 4.8%
Johnson & Johnson 4.2%
Procter & Gamble Co. 3.8%
UnitedHealth Group 3.5%
Visa Inc. 3.2%

Note: More tech, healthcare, growth companies

Investment Recommendation

🎯 Choose VYM If:

  • Maximum current income is priority (3.1% vs 1.8%)
  • You're in or near retirement
  • You need income now, not later
  • You prefer broader diversification (450+ holdings)
  • You're investing in tax-advantaged accounts
  • You believe value stocks will outperform
  • You're comfortable with some yield trap risk
  • Current cash flow is more important than growth

📈 Choose VIG If:

  • Dividend growth is more important than current yield
  • You're in accumulation phase (younger investor)
  • Higher total returns matter (12.5% vs 10.8%)
  • You invest in taxable accounts (lower yield = less taxes)
  • Quality and stability are important to you
  • You're investing for 10+ year horizon
  • You want lower portfolio risk (beta 0.82 vs 0.88)
  • Future income growth is your priority

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For balanced approach: Consider 60% VIG + 40% VYM. This provides ~2.4% current yield with 7% dividend growth. For retirees: 70% VYM + 30% VIG provides ~2.7% yield with some growth. For accumulators: 80% VIG + 20% VYM maximizes growth with some income. Important: Both are excellent Vanguard ETFs with 0.06% expense ratios. The choice comes down to time horizon and income needs. In taxable accounts, VIG's lower yield is more tax-efficient. Consider lifecycle approach: Start with VIG when young, gradually shift to VYM as retirement approaches. For maximum flexibility: Hold both and adjust allocation based on market conditions and income needs.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: VYM vs VIG?

VYM
Choose VYM if you want a higher current yield than SCHD from a very broad basket of large-cap U.S. payers.
VIG
Choose VIG if you prioritise the largest, most stable dividend growers and are willing to accept a lower current yield for higher quality and lower volatility.
Bottom line: VYM pays more income today, while VIG pays less now but has historically grown its dividend faster and screens harder for quality. If current yield matters most, lean VYM; if a growing, durable income stream matters more, lean VIG.