VYM vs DGRO: High Yield vs Dividend Growth

Vanguard High Dividend Yield vs iShares Core Dividend Growth. High current income vs sustainable dividend growth strategies analyzed.

VYM

VYM

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

3.1%
Dividend Yield
0.06%
Expense Ratio
10.8%
5-Year Return
450+
Holdings

VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield /, selecting US companies with above-average dividend yields. No quality screens beyond being in the FTSE US All Cap /. Higher yield comes from value-oriented, higher payout ratio companies.

High Yield Value Focus Low-Cost Broad Diversification Income Focused
DGRO

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

2.4%
Dividend Yield
0.08%
Expense Ratio
11.5%
5-Year Return
420
Holdings

DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth /, focusing on companies with at least 5 consecutive years of dividend growth. Emphasizes dividend sustainability and growth potential rather than highest current yield. Lower yield but higher growth.

Dividend Growth Quality Screens Low Payout Ratio Growth Focused Financial Health

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric VYM DGRO Winner
Dividend Yield 3.1% 2.4% VYM (+0.7%)
Expense Ratio 0.06% 0.08% VYM (-0.02%)
5-Year Annual Return 10.8% 11.5% DGRO (+0.7%)
Dividend Growth (5-Year) 5.2% 9.8% DGRO (+4.6%)
Assets Under Management $56.3B $24.1B VYM
P/E Ratio 14.8 18.2 VYM (Cheaper)
Payout Ratio 55% 38% DGRO (More Sustainable)
Beta vs S&P 500 0.88 0.82 DGRO (Lower Risk)

Performance Comparison

VYM Performance

Higher current income with competitive total returns. Tends to outperform during value rallies and high inflation periods. More cyclical exposure leads to higher volatility during downturns. Strong performance when interest rates are low and investors chase yield.

10.8%
5-Year Return
3.1%
Yield
5.2%
Div Growth
0.88
Beta

DGRO Performance

Lower current yield but higher dividend growth and total returns. Better risk-adjusted returns with lower beta. Outperforms during growth phases and market recoveries. More defensive characteristics with higher quality holdings. Better long-term compounding potential.

11.5%
5-Year Return
2.4%
Yield
9.8%
Div Growth
0.82
Beta

Strategy Analysis

VYM Approach

High dividend yield focus:

  • FTSE High Dividend Yield /
  • Above-average dividend yield companies
  • No minimum dividend growth requirement
  • No quality screens beyond / inclusion
  • Market-cap weighted
  • Value-oriented portfolio
  • Higher payout ratio companies
  • Current income optimization

DGRO Approach

Sustainable dividend growth focus:

  • Minimum 5 years dividend growth
  • Payout ratio ≤ 75% requirement
  • Financial health screens
  • Dividend sustainability emphasis
  • Growth-oriented dividend payers
  • Lower current yield, higher growth
  • Quality and stability focus
  • Long-term compounding approach

Income vs Growth Tradeoff

VYM provides higher current income (3.1% vs 2.4%) but lower dividend growth (5.2% vs 9.8%). DGRO sacrifices current yield for higher future income growth. Over 10 years, DGRO's faster dividend growth can overcome VYM's initial yield advantage.

Yield Advantage

+0.7%
VYM Yield Premium

Growth Advantage

+4.6%
DGRO Growth Premium

Crossover Point

~7 Years
DGRO Catches VYM Income

10-Year Income

+15%
DGRO Income Advantage

Value vs Growth Characteristics

VYM is more value-oriented with lower P/E (14.8 vs 18.2) and higher yield. DGRO has growth characteristics with higher P/E and faster dividend growth. This represents the classic value vs growth investment decision.

VYM Value Traits

Lower P/E: 14.8 vs 18.2

Higher Yield: 3.1% vs 2.4%

Value Sectors: Financials, Energy, Utilities

Performance: Outperforms in value cycles

DGRO Growth Traits

Higher P/E: 18.2 vs 14.8

Faster Growth: 9.8% vs 5.2%

Growth Sectors: Tech, Healthcare, Industrials

Performance: Outperforms in growth cycles

Market Cycle Performance

2000-2007: VYM outperformed (value cycle)

2009-2020: DGRO outperformed (growth cycle)

2021-2022: VYM outperformed (value cycle)

Long-term: DGRO slight edge (11.5% vs 10.8%)

Risk & Quality Analysis

Quality & Risk Metrics

DGRO has stricter quality screens (5-year dividend growth, payout ratio ≤ 75%) leading to higher quality portfolio. VYM includes some high-yield companies with questionable sustainability.

Dividend Cut Risk

Lower
DGRO (Quality Screens)

Payout Ratio

38% vs 55%
DGRO vs VYM Average

ROE Average

18% vs 15%
DGRO vs VYM Average

Debt/Equity

0.8 vs 1.2
DGRO vs VYM Average

Quality Comparison

DGRO's quality screens result in higher quality portfolio with better financial health metrics. VYM includes some "yield traps" - companies with high yields but questionable sustainability.

DGRO Quality Advantages

Dividend growth track record: 5+ years minimum

Payout ratio discipline: ≤ 75% requirement

Financial health screens: Excludes distressed companies

Earnings stability: More consistent performers

VYM Quality Concerns

No growth requirement: Includes stagnant dividends

High payout ratios: Some > 100%

Yield traps: Some unsustainable high yields

Cyclical exposure: More economic sensitivity

Performance During Stress

2008 Crisis: DGRO -35% vs VYM -38%

2020 Crash: DGRO -22% vs VYM -25%

Dividend cuts 2020: DGRO 2% vs VYM 8%

Recovery speed: DGRO faster post-crisis

Income Analysis

VYM Income Profile

Higher current income but slower growth. More sensitive to interest rate changes. Includes higher-yielding but potentially riskier companies. Better for investors needing maximum current income.

Current Yield 3.1%
5-Year Dividend Growth 5.2%
10-Year Projected Yield ~5.1%
Income Stability Medium

DGRO Income Profile

Lower current income but faster growth. More predictable dividend increases. Higher quality companies with sustainable payout ratios. Better for long-term investors focused on income growth.

Current Yield 2.4%
5-Year Dividend Growth 9.8%
10-Year Projected Yield ~6.0%
Income Stability High

Sector Allocation Comparison

VYM Sectors (Value & Yield Focused)

Financials 21.5%
Healthcare 16.2%
Consumer Staples 14.8%
Information Technology 11.2%
Energy 9.5%

DGRO Sectors (Growth & Quality Focused)

Information Technology 22.3%
Healthcare 18.5%
Financials 15.8%
Industrials 13.2%
Consumer Staples 10.5%

Top Holdings Comparison

VYM Top Holdings (High Yield Focus)

JPMorgan Chase & Co. 3.8%
Johnson & Johnson 3.5%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 3.2%
Procter & Gamble Co. 2.8%
Verizon Communications 2.5%

Note: More financials, energy, telecom exposure for yield

DGRO Top Holdings (Growth Focus)

Microsoft Corp. 4.2%
Apple Inc. 4.1%
Johnson & Johnson 3.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 3.5%
UnitedHealth Group 3.2%

Note: More tech, healthcare, growth-oriented companies

Investment Recommendation

🎯 Choose VYM If:

  • You need maximum current income (3.1% vs 2.4%)
  • You're in or near retirement
  • You believe value stocks will outperform
  • Lower expense ratio matters (0.06% vs 0.08%)
  • You prefer simpler yield-focused strategy
  • You're investing during low interest rates
  • You want broader diversification (450+ holdings)
  • You're comfortable with some yield trap risk

📈 Choose DGRO If:

  • You prioritize dividend growth over current yield
  • You're in accumulation phase (younger investor)
  • Higher total returns matter (11.5% vs 10.8%)
  • Quality screens provide comfort
  • You want lower risk (beta 0.82 vs 0.88)
  • You believe growth will outperform value
  • Dividend sustainability is critical
  • You're investing for 10+ year horizon

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For balanced income and growth: Consider 60% DGRO + 40% VYM. This provides ~2.8% current yield with 8% dividend growth. For retirees needing income: 70% VYM + 30% DGRO provides ~2.9% yield with some growth. For accumulators: 80% DGRO + 20% VYM maximizes growth with some income. Important: VYM performs better during value cycles (like 2021-2022), DGRO during growth cycles. Consider overweighting based on market cycle. Both are excellent core holdings - the choice depends on your time horizon and income needs. Younger investors should favor DGRO for compounding, retirees may prefer VYM for income. For tax efficiency: DGRO's lower yield means less current taxable income. In taxable accounts, DGRO may be more tax-efficient despite higher expense ratio.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: VYM vs DGRO?

VYM
Choose VYM if you want a higher current yield than SCHD from a very broad basket of large-cap U.S. payers.
DGRO
Choose DGRO if you want broad, low-cost exposure to companies with consistent dividend-growth histories, with a slightly lower yield than SCHD but more holdings.
Bottom line: VYM pays more income today, while DGRO pays less now but has historically grown its dividend faster and screens harder for quality. If current yield matters most, lean VYM; if a growing, durable income stream matters more, lean DGRO.