DIVO vs DGRO: Enhanced Income vs Pure Growth

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF. Compare active covered call enhancement with passive dividend growth investing for income and total returns.

DIVO

DIVO

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

5.1%
Distribution Yield
0.55%
Expense Ratio
11.8%
Since 2016 Return
~25
Holdings

DIVO combines a concentrated portfolio of quality dividend stocks with a selective covered call strategy. The ETF holds approximately 25 high-quality, dividend-growing companies and sells covered calls on only a portion of the portfolio (typically 20-30%). This hybrid approach aims to enhance income while maintaining substantial upside participation and capital appreciation potential. Managed by CWA Asset Management with a focus on total returns.

Covered Calls High Quality Concentrated Enhanced Income Active Management
DGRO

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

2.4%
Dividend Yield
0.08%
Expense Ratio
12.5%
Since 2014 Return
400+
Holdings

DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, investing in companies with a history of consistently growing dividends. The ETF focuses on dividend sustainability, financial health, and dividend growth potential. It takes a pure-play approach to dividend growth investing with no options strategies or income enhancement. Offers lower current yield but higher dividend growth rates and full market upside participation.

Dividend Growth Broad Diversification Low Cost Passive Strategy Quality Focus

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric DIVO DGRO Winner
Distribution/Dividend Yield 5.1% 2.4% DIVO (+2.7%)
Expense Ratio 0.55% 0.08% DGRO (7x lower)
Total Return (Since 2016) 11.8% 12.5% DGRO (+0.7%)
Assets Under Management $3.2B $24B DGRO (Larger)
Inception Date Dec 2016 Jun 2014 DGRO (Older)
Beta vs S&P 500 0.75 0.85 DIVO (Lower volatility)
Distribution Frequency Monthly Quarterly DIVO (More frequent)
Tax Efficiency Good (Mostly qualified) Excellent (Qualified dividends) DGRO (Better)
Upside Participation 85-90% 100% DGRO (Full upside)

Performance Comparison

DIVO Performance Profile

Enhanced income with strong total returns. Selective covered call strategy boosts yield while maintaining 85-90% upside participation. Lower volatility than pure equity strategies (beta 0.75). Monthly distributions provide regular income. Since inception, has delivered competitive returns with reduced drawdowns. Concentrated portfolio of high-quality companies with active options overlay. Income enhancement comes from selling calls on only 20-30% of portfolio.

5.1%
Distribution Yield
11.8%
Since 2016 Return
0.75
Beta
-14%
2022 Drawdown

DGRO Performance Profile

Lower current yield but higher dividend growth. Pure dividend growth strategy with full market upside. Higher total returns with greater volatility. Quarterly distributions suitable for long-term compounding. Excellent long-term track record since 2014. Broad diversification with 400+ holdings. Focus on companies with consistent dividend growth history. Ultra-low expenses (0.08%) maximize net returns.

2.4%
Dividend Yield
12.5%
Since 2014 Return
0.85
Beta
-16%
2022 Drawdown

Strategy Analysis

DIVO Hybrid Approach

Quality dividend stocks + selective covered calls:

  • Concentrated portfolio of ~25 high-quality companies
  • Focus on dividend growers with strong fundamentals
  • Sells covered calls on only 20-30% of portfolio
  • Selective option writing based on market conditions
  • Goal: Enhance income while maintaining 85-90% upside
  • Active management by CWA Asset Management
  • Monthly income distributions
  • Lower volatility than pure equity strategies

DGRO Pure Growth Approach

Passive dividend growth strategy:

  • Broad portfolio of 400+ US dividend growers
  • Tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index
  • No active management - rules-based approach
  • Focus on consistent dividend growth history
  • Minimum 5 years of dividend growth required
  • No derivatives or options strategies
  • Full market upside participation
  • Focus on long-term dividend growth compounding

Risk & Return Analysis

DIVO's enhanced income approach vs DGRO's pure growth strategy creates different risk/return profiles.

Income Characteristics

Current Yield: DIVO 5.1% vs DGRO 2.4%

Yield Enhancement: DIVO +2.7% from options

Dividend Growth: DIVO 6-8% vs DGRO 8-10%

Income Frequency: DIVO monthly vs DGRO quarterly

Growth & Upside

Upside Participation: DIVO 85-90% vs DGRO 100%

Historical Total Return: DIVO 11.8% vs DGRO 12.5%

Management Style: DIVO active vs DGRO passive

Compounding Potential: Both excellent

Risk Metrics

Volatility: DIVO lower (beta 0.75) vs DGRO higher

Concentration Risk: DIVO high vs DGRO low

Options Risk: DIVO has limited vs DGRO none

Active Management Risk: DIVO has some vs DGRO none

Income Analysis

DIVO Income Profile

Enhanced income from selective covered call strategy. Approximately 2.7% of the 5.1% yield comes from options premiums. Monthly distributions provide regular cash flow. Dividend growth from underlying holdings (6-8% annually). Tax treatment is mostly qualified dividends with some options income. Income enhancement is sustainable due to selective approach. Lower volatility income stream. Ideal for investors wanting above-average yield with growth participation.

Distribution Yield 5.1%
Options Contribution ~2.7%
Dividend Growth 6-8% annually
Tax Efficiency Good

DGRO Income Profile

Lower current yield with superior growth potential. Pure dividend growth approach with no income enhancement. Dividend increases historically 8-10% annually. Tax efficient with almost entirely qualified dividends. Quarterly distributions suitable for long-term compounding. Income grows substantially over time through dividend hikes. Ultra-low expenses (0.08%) maximize net income. Better for investors prioritizing income growth and long-term compounding.

Dividend Yield 2.4%
Dividend Growth 8-10% annually
Yield on Cost (10yr) ~5.5%
Tax Efficiency Excellent

Portfolio Characteristics

DIVO Portfolio (Concentrated Quality + Options)

Number of Holdings ~25
Top Holding: Microsoft 6.5%
Apple 6.2%
JPMorgan Chase 5.8%
Technology + Healthcare 45%

Note: Highly concentrated, quality focus, selective options, active management

DGRO Portfolio (Broad Dividend Growth)

Number of Holdings 400+
Top Holding: Microsoft 4.2%
Apple 3.8%
Johnson & Johnson 2.5%
Technology + Healthcare 40%

Note: Broad diversification, dividend growth focus, passive, low turnover

Options Strategy Analysis (DIVO Specific)

DIVO's Selective Options Approach

Coverage Level: Only 20-30% of portfolio covered

Option Type: Out-of-the-money (OTM) covered calls

Strike Selection: Strategic based on market conditions

Expiration: Typically 30-45 days

Premium Capture: 2-4% annualized enhancement

Upside Sacrifice: Minimal (10-15% capped on covered portion)

Management: Active, discretionary decisions

Risk Management: Selective writing reduces risk

Benefits vs Pure Covered Call ETFs

Higher Upside: 85-90% vs 50-70% for full covered call ETFs

Better Growth: Maintains dividend growth potential

Lower Volatility: Still provides some downside protection

Quality Focus: Options on only highest conviction names

Tax Efficiency: Better than full covered call strategies

Flexibility: Can adjust coverage based on markets

Total Return Focus: Not just income maximization

Risk Management: Less exposed to single strategy

Historical Performance & Market Scenarios

DIVO in Different Markets

Bull Markets: Captures 85-90% of upside with enhanced income

Bear Markets: Outperforms with options income cushion

Sideways Markets: Excels with options premium collection

High Volatility: Benefits from higher option premiums

Low Volatility: Lower premiums but still enhanced yield

Dividend Growth Markets: Participates fully in dividend hikes

Value vs Growth Rotation: Balanced exposure performs well

DGRO in Different Markets

Dividend Growth Leadership: Strong outperformance

Bear Markets: Declines but less than growth stocks

Sideways Markets: Steady dividend growth continues

High Volatility: Lower volatility than growth counterparts

Low Volatility: Steady compounding with dividend growth

Rising Rate Environments: Mixed (depends on sector mix)

Long-term Compounding: Excellent track record

Tax & Cost Efficiency Analysis

DIVO Tax & Cost Profile

Expense Ratio: 0.55% (moderate for active strategy)

Tax Treatment: Mostly qualified dividends + some options income

Tax Efficiency: Good - better than full covered call ETFs

Tax Drag: Moderate - some non-qualified income

Taxable Account Suitability: Good but not ideal

Long-term Tax Impact: Higher than DGRO but manageable

Total Cost Impact: 0.55% ER + moderate tax drag

Net Yield After Costs: ~4.5% (5.1% gross)

DGRO Tax & Cost Profile

Expense Ratio: 0.08% (exceptionally low)

Tax Treatment: Almost entirely qualified dividends

Tax Efficiency: Excellent for dividend income

Tax Drag: Very low - tax-efficient distributions

Taxable Account Suitability: Excellent

Long-term Tax Impact: Minimal tax burden

Total Cost Impact: Negligible (0.08% ER)

Net Yield After Costs: ~2.32% (2.4% gross)

Investment Recommendation

🎯 Choose DIVO If:

  • You want enhanced income (5.1% vs 2.4%)
  • Monthly distributions are important for cash flow
  • You prefer lower volatility (beta 0.75)
  • You want active management with options overlay
  • You're near or in retirement needing higher income
  • You want substantial upside (85-90%) with income
  • You're comfortable with concentrated portfolios
  • You want a hybrid approach (growth + income)

📈 Choose DGRO If:

  • You prioritize ultra-low costs (0.08% ER)
  • Maximum tax efficiency in taxable accounts matters
  • You want full market upside participation (100%)
  • Dividend growth (8-10% annually) is your priority
  • You prefer passive, rules-based investing
  • You have long time horizon (10+ years)
  • You want broad diversification (400+ holdings)
  • You value simplicity and proven track record

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For balanced income with growth: Use DIVO for enhanced income (40-50%) combined with DGRO for pure growth (50-60%). For retirement income ladder: DIVO for near-term monthly cash flow, DGRO for long-term growth and increasing income. For tax efficiency optimization: Hold DGRO in taxable accounts, DIVO in tax-advantaged accounts. For core-satellite approach: DGRO as core holding (70-80%) with DIVO as income satellite (20-30%). For blended approach: 70% DGRO + 30% DIVO provides ~3.2% blended yield with good growth. Important: DIVO's 0.55% expense ratio is reasonable for active strategy with options. DGRO's 0.08% ER is exceptional value. DIVO better for income-focused investors wanting some growth. DGRO better for growth-focused investors wanting income growth. During strong bull markets, DGRO outperforms. During bear/sideways markets, DIVO performs better. Consider combining both for optimal balance.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: DIVO vs DGRO?

DIVO
Choose DIVO if you want a hybrid of quality dividend stocks plus selective covered calls for income with some growth.
DGRO
Choose DGRO if you want broad, low-cost exposure to companies with consistent dividend-growth histories, with a slightly lower yield than SCHD but more holdings.
Bottom line: This is the classic income-now vs income-growth trade-off: DIVO pays a much higher yield today from its options strategy but gives up most long-term upside, while DGRO starts with a lower yield that has historically grown and keeps full participation in share-price gains. Choose DIVO if you need maximum cash flow now; choose DGRO if you are still building and want a rising income stream.