VEA vs EFA: Developed Markets ETF Battle

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. Compare two leading international developed markets ETFs: Vanguard's ultra-low-cost approach vs iShares' established EAFE strategy.

VEA

VEA

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF

0.05%
Expense Ratio
3.1%
Dividend Yield
5.8%
10-Year Return
3,900+
Total Holdings

VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, providing exposure to developed markets outside the United States. The ETF includes large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap stocks from Europe, Pacific, and Canada, covering approximately 98% of the investable market capitalization in developed international markets. With over 3,900 holdings and an ultra-low 0.05% expense ratio, VEA offers comprehensive, cost-effective exposure to established international economies. It excludes emerging markets, focusing solely on developed economies with stable regulatory environments.

Developed Markets Ultra-Low Cost All-Cap International Vanguard
EFA

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

0.33%
Expense Ratio
3.3%
Dividend Yield
5.5%
10-Year Return
795
Large/Mid-Cap

EFA tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East), providing exposure to developed markets outside of North America. As one of the oldest and most established international ETFs, EFA focuses on large and mid-cap companies across 21 developed markets. The ETF excludes Canada and the United States, focusing specifically on European and Asian developed economies. With nearly $60 billion in assets, EFA is the most liquid international ETF available, offering excellent tradability and tight bid-ask spreads for investors seeking established international exposure.

MSCI EAFE Large/Mid-Cap International Liquid iShares

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric VEA (Vanguard) EFA (iShares) Winner
Expense Ratio 0.05% 0.33% VEA (-0.28%)
Dividend Yield 3.1% 3.3% EFA (+0.2%)
10-Year Annual Return 5.8% 5.5% VEA (+0.3%)
Number of Holdings 3,900+ 795 VEA (More diversified)
Assets Under Management $140B $58B VEA (Larger AUM)
Inception Year 2007 2001 EFA (Older)
Canada Exposure 7.5% 0% VEA (Includes Canada)
Small-Cap Exposure 12% 0% VEA (Small-cap included)
P/E Ratio 14.2 14.5 VEA (Slightly cheaper)
Price/Book Ratio 1.6 1.7 VEA (Better valuation)
10-Year Volatility 16.5% 16.3% EFA (Slightly lower)
Average Daily Volume 4.5M shares 18M shares EFA (More liquid)
Turnover Rate 3% 4% VEA (Lower turnover)

Performance Comparison

VEA Performance Profile

Competitive returns with ultra-low cost structure providing cost advantage over time. Broad diversification across 3,900+ companies reduces single-stock risk. Includes small-cap exposure (12%) for potential growth opportunities. Canada exposure (7.5%) provides North American diversification beyond US. Slightly better historical returns despite similar market exposure. Lower expense ratio compounds over long investment horizon. All-cap approach captures entire developed markets opportunity set. Better tax efficiency from lower turnover (3%). The cost-effective choice for long-term international investors.

5.8%
10-Year Return
3.1%
Dividend Yield
16.5%
Volatility
-34%
2020 Drawdown

EFA Performance Profile

Established track record as the original international ETF (2001 inception). Higher liquidity with 18M daily shares traded providing excellent tradability. Pure EAFE focus excludes Canada for targeted Europe/Asia exposure. Large/mid-cap focus provides stability with established international companies. Slightly higher dividend yield from mature international companies. Excellent for tactical trading due to high liquidity and tight spreads. Traditional EAFE benchmark widely used by institutional investors. More concentrated portfolio (795 holdings) with larger average position sizes. The liquid choice for active investors and large institutions.

5.5%
10-Year Return
3.3%
Dividend Yield
16.3%
Volatility
-33%
2020 Drawdown

Strategy & Geographic Analysis

VEA: FTSE Developed All Cap Strategy

Comprehensive developed markets exposure:

  • Tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index
  • 3,900+ holdings across all market capitalizations
  • Ultra-low 0.05% expense ratio
  • Large-Cap: 75% (established international leaders)
  • Mid-Cap: 13% (growth potential companies)
  • Small-Cap: 12% (small company exposure)
  • Canada: 7.5% (North American diversification)
  • Japan: 22% (largest country allocation)
  • United Kingdom: 15% (European anchor)
  • France: 9%, Switzerland: 8%, Germany: 8%
  • Australia: 6%, South Korea: 4%

EFA: MSCI EAFE Strategy

Traditional EAFE large/mid-cap exposure:

  • Tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East)
  • 795 holdings (large and mid-cap only)
  • No Canada or US exposure (pure EAFE)
  • Japan: 24% (largest country weight)
  • United Kingdom: 15% (second largest)
  • France: 11%, Switzerland: 9%, Germany: 8%
  • Australia: 7%, Netherlands: 3%
  • Denmark: 3%, Sweden: 3%, Hong Kong: 2%
  • No small-cap companies included
  • Higher liquidity for active trading

Geographic & Market Cap Differences

Key differences in country exposure and market capitalization coverage:

VEA Market Cap Distribution

Mega-Cap (>$50B) 35%
Large-Cap ($10B-$50B) 40%
Mid-Cap ($2B-$10B) 13%
Small-Cap ($300M-$2B) 12%
Micro-Cap (<$300M) 0%
Total Companies 3,900+

EFA Market Cap Distribution

Mega-Cap (>$50B) 45%
Large-Cap ($10B-$50B) 40%
Mid-Cap ($2B-$10B) 15%
Small-Cap ($300M-$2B) 0%
Micro-Cap (<$300M) 0%
Total Companies 795

Investment Implications

VEA Benefits: Small-cap exposure, lower cost, Canada diversification

EFA Benefits: Higher liquidity, pure EAFE, established benchmark

VEA Risks: Small-cap volatility, currency risk

EFA Risks: Higher cost, no small-cap growth potential

Cost Difference: VEA saves 0.28% annually on expenses

Long-Term Advantage: VEA's cost advantage compounds over time

Holdings & Country Analysis

VEA Top Holdings (Global Leaders)

Nestlé 1.5%
ASML Holding 1.3%
Toyota Motor 1.2%
Novo Nordisk 1.1%
LVMH Moët Hennessy 1.0%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.9%

Note: Lower concentration due to 3,900+ holdings, includes small/mid-caps not shown

EFA Top Holdings (EAFE Leaders)

Nestlé 1.8%
ASML Holding 1.6%
Toyota Motor 1.5%
Novo Nordisk 1.4%
LVMH Moët Hennessy 1.3%
AstraZeneca 1.2%

Note: Similar holdings but higher concentration due to fewer companies (795 vs 3,900)

VEA Country Allocation

Japan 22%
United Kingdom 15%
Canada 7.5%
France 9%
Switzerland 8%
Other Developed 38.5%

EFA Country Allocation

Japan 24%
United Kingdom 15%
France 11%
Switzerland 9%
Australia 7%
Other EAFE 34%

Country Comparison Insights

Canada Exposure VEA Only
Japan Overweight EFA +2%
France Overweight EFA +2%
Small-Cap Countries VEA Only
Geographic Diversification VEA Better
Pure EAFE Focus EFA Only

Sector & Currency Analysis

VEA Sector Allocation

Financials 18%
Industrials 16%
Consumer Discretionary 13%
Healthcare 12%
Information Technology 10%
Other Sectors 31%

EFA Sector Allocation

Financials 17%
Industrials 16%
Healthcare 13%
Consumer Discretionary 12%
Information Technology 9%
Other Sectors 33%

Currency Exposure & Risks

Japanese Yen Both ~22-24%
Euro Both ~30%
British Pound Both ~15%
Canadian Dollar VEA Only (7.5%)
Swiss Franc Both ~8-9%
Currency Hedge Available Both (VXUS/HEFA)

Risk & Cost Analysis

VEA Risk Profile

Volatility (10-Year) 16.5%
Maximum Drawdown (2020) -34%
Beta (vs S&P 500) 0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10-Year) 0.35
Expense Ratio 0.05%
10-Year Cost on $10K $58

Key Risk Factors: Currency risk, developed markets economic risk, small-cap volatility, geopolitical risk. Cost Advantage: Ultra-low 0.05% expense ratio provides significant long-term savings.

EFA Risk Profile

Volatility (10-Year) 16.3%
Maximum Drawdown (2020) -33%
Beta (vs S&P 500) 0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10-Year) 0.34
Expense Ratio 0.33%
10-Year Cost on $10K $383

Key Risk Factors: Currency risk, EAFE economic concentration, large-cap bias, higher expense drag. Liquidity Advantage: Higher trading volume provides better execution for large trades.

Cost vs Performance Trade-off Analysis

Cost Difference: EFA costs 0.28% more annually than VEA
Performance Difference: VEA returned 0.3% more annually over 10 years
Total Advantage: VEA provides 0.58% annual advantage (cost + performance)
On $100,000 over 20 years (6% base return):
• VEA: ~$320,714 (after 0.05% fees, 5.8% net return)
• EFA: ~$291,995 (after 0.33% fees, 5.5% net return)
• Difference: ~$28,719 higher with VEA due to lower costs
Small-Cap Advantage: VEA's 12% small-cap exposure provides growth potential
Canada Diversification: VEA's 7.5% Canada exposure adds North American stability
Note: International returns have been modest recently, making cost differences more impactful.

Small-Cap & Diversification Analysis

VEA's Small-Cap & All-Cap Advantage

Market Coverage: 12% of portfolio in small-cap companies

Growth Potential: Small-caps historically outperform over long term

Diversification: Exposure to 3,900+ companies vs 795 in EFA

Innovation: Small-caps include next-generation international companies

Valuation: Small-caps often trade at valuation discounts

Economic Sensitivity: Small-caps more sensitive to local economic growth

Acquisition Targets: Small-caps often acquisition targets for large multinationals

Canada Inclusion: 7.5% Canada exposure adds resource/energy diversification

EFA's Large/Mid-Cap & Liquidity Focus

Pure Focus: 100% large/mid-cap, no small-cap dilution

Quality: MSCI EAFE companies have proven international business models

Liquidity: 18M daily shares vs 4.5M for VEA

Stability: Large-caps generally more stable during volatility

Dividends: Higher dividend yield (3.3% vs 3.1%)

Global Reach: Established multinationals with global revenue

Brand Power: Well-known international brands

Trading Efficiency: Better for active traders and large institutions

Historical Performance Context

2000-2010 (International Outperformance): EFA had advantage as established option
2010-2020 (US Outperformance): Both underperformed US markets
Currency Impact: Both have similar currency exposure (yen, euro, pound)
Valuation Cycles: International markets currently trade at discounts to US
Future Outlook: International valuations suggest potential catch-up to US
Strategic Consideration: VEA provides better cost structure for long-term holding
Tactical Consideration: EFA provides better liquidity for active positioning

Investor Use Cases & Scenarios

When VEA Excels

Long-Term Buy & Hold: Ultra-low cost compounds over decades

Complete International Exposure: Want all-cap developed markets coverage

Small-Cap Believers: Want international small-cap exposure

Canada Diversification: Want North American exposure beyond US

Cost-Conscious Investors: Want minimum expense drag (0.05%)

Passive Investors: Building permanent international allocation

Tax-Efficient Accounts: Lower turnover (3%) helps in taxable accounts

Core International Holding: As foundation for international allocation

When EFA Excels

Active Traders: Need high liquidity and tight spreads

Institutional Investors: Large trade execution important

EAFE Purists: Want traditional EAFE exposure without Canada

Dividend Focus: Want slightly higher dividend yield

Tactical Allocation: Making short-term international adjustments

Options Traders: Need liquid options market (EFA has options)

Benchmark Tracking: Matching MSCI EAFE institutional benchmark

Established Track Record: Prefer 2001 inception with long history

Investment Recommendation

💰 Choose VEA If:

  • You're a long-term buy & hold investor
  • Ultra-low cost is your top priority (0.05%)
  • You want international small-cap exposure (12%)
  • You want Canada diversification (7.5%)
  • You prefer maximum diversification (3,900+ holdings)
  • You're building a permanent international allocation
  • You want the most cost-effective developed markets ETF
  • You believe in all-cap approach for international markets

🏦 Choose EFA If:

  • You need high liquidity for active trading
  • You're making large institutional trades
  • You want pure EAFE exposure without Canada
  • You prefer established track record (2001 inception)
  • You trade options on international ETFs
  • You're matching MSCI EAFE institutional benchmark
  • You want slightly higher dividend yield (3.3%)
  • You make tactical adjustments to international allocation

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For long-term investors: VEA as core international holding. For active traders: EFA for liquidity and trading flexibility. For complete international: VEA for developed + VWO for emerging markets. For currency hedge: Consider VXUS (includes emerging) or currency-hedged versions. For tax efficiency: Both are fairly tax-efficient, but VEA's lower turnover may help. For retirement accounts: VEA for long-term compounding with low costs. For taxable accounts: VEA's lower turnover provides slight tax advantage. For institutional use: EFA for large trade execution and liquidity. For options strategies: EFA has more established options market.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: VEA vs EFA?

VEA
Choose VEA if you want low-cost developed-markets exposure outside North America.
EFA
Choose EFA if you want established developed-markets (EAFE) exposure.
Bottom line: Both VEA and EFA are international funds, so the decision comes down to the finer details — expense ratio, exact holdings, yield and dividend-growth rate. Compare the figures in the table above and pick the one whose costs and composition fit your plan.