DGRO vs DIV: Dividend Growth vs SuperDividend

iShares Core Dividend Growth vs Global X SuperDividend ETF. Which offers better long-term growth, yield sustainability, and risk management?

DGRO

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

2.45%
Dividend Yield
0.08%
Expense Ratio
10.8%
5-Year Return
448
Holdings

DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, selecting U.S. companies with a history of consistently growing dividends. Focuses on sustainable dividend growth rather than high current yield. Quality screens for financial health and payout sustainability.

Dividend Growth Quality Focus Low-Cost US Only Financial Health
DIV

DIV

Global X SuperDividend ETF

6.85%
Dividend Yield
0.58%
Expense Ratio
4.2%
5-Year Return
100
Holdings

DIV tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, selecting 100 of the highest dividend-yielding equity securities globally. Focuses purely on maximizing current income without regard for dividend growth or sustainability. Includes REITs, MLPs, and high-yield equities.

Super High Yield Global Monthly Dividends REITs & MLPs Current Income Focus

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric DGRO DIV Winner
Dividend Yield 2.45% 6.85% DIV (+4.40%)
Expense Ratio 0.08% 0.58% DGRO (-0.50%)
5-Year Annual Return 10.8% 4.2% DGRO (+6.6%)
Number of Holdings 448 100 DGRO (4.5x more)
Assets Under Management $24.6B $2.8B DGRO
5-Year Dividend Growth 8.2% 1.5% DGRO (+6.7%)
P/E Ratio 19.5 12.8 DIV (cheaper)
Beta vs S&P 500 0.82 1.05 DGRO (lower risk)

Performance Comparison

DGRO Performance

Much higher total returns with moderate yield. Strong dividend growth provides inflation protection. Lower beta offers better downside protection. Quality screens ensure dividend sustainability. Broad diversification reduces concentration risk.

10.8%
5-Year Return
2.45%
Yield
0.82
Beta
448
Holdings

DIV Performance

Very high current income with low total returns. Monthly dividends provide cash flow. Higher beta indicates more volatility. Concentrated in highest-yield sectors globally. Includes REITs and MLPs for yield enhancement.

4.2%
5-Year Return
6.85%
Yield
1.05
Beta
100
Holdings

Strategy Analysis

DGRO Approach

Quality dividend growth methodology:

  • Tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index
  • Minimum 5-year dividend growth history
  • Payout ratio screening (< 75%)
  • Financial health requirements
  • US companies only
  • Market-cap weighted
  • Quality over yield focus
  • Long-term compounding emphasis

DIV Approach

Maximum current yield globally:

  • Tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index
  • Selects 100 highest-yielding stocks globally
  • Includes REITs, MLPs, and high-yield equities
  • No dividend growth requirements
  • Monthly dividend payments
  • Equal-weighted methodology
  • Yield maximization priority
  • Current income over growth

Geographical Exposure Differences

DGRO is exclusively U.S. focused while DIV provides global high-yield exposure including emerging markets.

US Exposure

100% vs 45%
DGRO vs DIV

International Developed

0% vs 35%
DGRO vs DIV

Emerging Markets

0% vs 20%
DGRO vs DIV

Currency Risk

Low vs High
DGRO vs DIV

Quality vs Yield Trade-off

DGRO's quality focus vs DIV's yield maximization creates dramatically different risk and return profiles.

Financial Quality Metrics

ROE (Average): DGRO 22% vs DIV 14%

Debt/Equity: DGRO 58% vs DIV 85%

Profit Margin: DGRO 18% vs DIV 10%

Dividend Coverage: DGRO 2.1x vs DIV 1.2x

Dividend Sustainability

Payout Ratio (Avg): DGRO 48% vs DIV 92%

Dividend Growth: DGRO 8.2% vs DIV 1.5%

Cut Risk: DGRO very low, DIV moderate-high

Inflation Protection: DGRO strong, DIV weak

Sector Composition

DGRO: Tech, Healthcare, Industrials

DIV: REITs, Financials, Utilities, Energy

Defensive Sectors: DIV heavier

Growth Sectors: DGRO heavier

Sector & Asset Class Comparison

Sector & Asset Class Weighting

DIV includes REITs and MLPs (30% combined) while DGRO focuses on traditional dividend growers in growth sectors.

Real Estate (REITs)

2% vs 20%
DGRO vs DIV

Energy & MLPs

6% vs 18%
DGRO vs DIV

Technology

20% vs 5%
DGRO vs DIV

Financials

16% vs 22%
DGRO vs DIV

Risk Profile & Volatility Characteristics

DIV's higher yield comes with significantly higher risk across multiple dimensions.

Volatility Metrics

Standard Deviation: DGRO 14.2% vs DIV 18.5%

Beta: DGRO 0.82 vs DIV 1.05

Max Drawdown (2020): DGRO -32% vs DIV -45%

Sharpe Ratio: DGRO 0.68 vs DIV 0.28

Dividend Risk Factors

Yield Chasing Risk: DIV high, DGRO low

Dividend Cut Frequency: DIV 5-8% annually

Recovery from Cuts: DGRO faster

Tax Complexity: DIV higher (MLPs, REITs)

Market Environment Sensitivity

Rising Rate Environment: Both hurt, DIV more

Recession: DGRO more defensive

Growth Environment: DGRO outperforms

Flat Markets: DIV yield cushion helps

Income Analysis

DGRO Income Profile

Moderate current yield with strong growth. Quality focus ensures dividend sustainability. Lower payout ratios for safety. Better inflation protection through growth. Quarterly dividends with growth compounding.

Current Yield 2.45%
5-Year Dividend Growth 8.2%
Payout Ratio 48%
Income Growth Excellent

DIV Income Profile

Very high current income with minimal growth. Monthly payments for cash flow. Includes REITs and MLPs for yield. Higher payout ratios increase risk. Global exposure adds currency risk but yield.

Current Yield 6.85%
5-Year Dividend Growth 1.5%
Payout Ratio 92%
Payment Frequency Monthly

Historical Performance & Backtesting

Long-Term Performance Comparison

DGRO has massively outperformed DIV over all time periods despite much lower yield, thanks to better quality and growth.

Since 2013 (DIV inception)

11.0% vs 4.5%
DGRO vs DIV Annualized

Maximum Drawdown (2020)

-32% vs -45%
DGRO vs DIV

Sharpe Ratio

0.68 vs 0.28
DGRO vs DIV

Dividend Growth

8.2% vs 1.5%
DGRO vs DIV CAGR

Top Holdings Comparison

DGRO Top Holdings (Quality Dividend Growth)

Microsoft Corp. (Technology) 4.8%
Johnson & Johnson (Healthcare) 3.2%
Procter & Gamble (Staples) 2.9%
JPMorgan Chase (Financials) 2.6%
UnitedHealth Group (Healthcare) 2.4%

Note: Quality dividend growers, 448 holdings, growth-oriented

DIV Top Holdings (Global High Yield)

MPLX LP (MLP - Energy) 2.1%
Annaly Capital (Mortgage REIT) 2.0%
AGNC Investment (Mortgage REIT) 1.9%
Enbridge Inc. (Canadian Pipeline) 1.8%
British American Tobacco 1.8%

Note: Global high yield, 100 holdings, REITs/MLPs heavy

Investment Recommendation

🌱 Choose DGRO If:

  • Total return is priority (10.8% vs 4.2%)
  • Dividend growth matters (8.2% vs 1.5%)
  • Quality and sustainability are important
  • Lower volatility appeals to you (beta 0.82 vs 1.05)
  • You have longer time horizon (7+ years)
  • Inflation protection through growth matters
  • Lower expense ratio valuable (0.08% vs 0.58%)
  • You prefer US-only exposure for simplicity

💰 Choose DIV If:

  • Maximum current income is absolute priority (6.85% vs 2.45%)
  • You're in retirement needing high cash flow
  • Monthly dividend payments are valuable
  • You want global high-yield exposure
  • You can tolerate higher volatility and risk
  • Tax complexity from MLPs/REITs is manageable
  • You have short time horizon (< 3 years)
  • Yield cushion during flat markets critical

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

Warning: These are fundamentally different strategies. DGRO is a quality dividend growth ETF for long-term compounding. DIV is a maximum yield ETF for current income with higher risk. For retirement income: Consider 20-30% DIV for yield boost with 70-80% DGRO for growth. For accumulation phase: Use DGRO as core (90%) with DIV satellite (10%) only if yield needed. For balanced approach: 80% DGRO + 20% DIV provides ~3.33% blended yield with better growth than DIV alone. Critical: DIV's 4.4% yield advantage is completely offset by DGRO's 6.6% annual performance advantage. DGRO investors catch up to DIV's income in ~3 years through growth. DIV's higher expense ratio (0.58% vs 0.08%) creates additional drag. Consider combining with SCHD: 50% SCHD + 40% DGRO + 10% DIV for balanced yield/growth/quality.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: DGRO vs DIV?

DGRO
Choose DGRO if you want broad, low-cost exposure to companies with consistent dividend-growth histories, with a slightly lower yield than SCHD but more holdings.
DIV
Choose DIV if you want a very high headline yield and accept the higher risk that comes with it.
Bottom line: DIV pays more income today, while DGRO pays less now but has historically grown its dividend faster and screens harder for quality. If current yield matters most, lean DIV; if a growing, durable income stream matters more, lean DGRO.