VYM vs HDV: Vanguard vs iShares High Dividend ETFs

Two approaches to high dividend yield investing: Vanguard's broad yield focus vs iShares' quality screens and defensive tilt.

VYM

VYM

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

3.1%
Dividend Yield
0.06%
Expense Ratio
10.8%
5-Year Return
450+
Holdings

VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, selecting US companies with above-average dividend yields. Broad diversification with minimal quality screens beyond index inclusion. Pure yield-focused approach with value characteristics.

High Yield Broad Diversification Low-Cost Value Focused Current Income
HDV

HDV

iShares Core High Dividend ETF

3.8%
Dividend Yield
0.08%
Expense Ratio
9.2%
5-Year Return
75
Holdings

HDV tracks the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, requiring quality screens including positive earnings, cash flows, and sustainable payout ratios. More concentrated portfolio with defensive characteristics and quality emphasis.

High Yield Quality Screens Defensive Focus Concentrated iShares Core

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric VYM HDV Winner
Dividend Yield 3.1% 3.8% HDV (+0.7%)
Expense Ratio 0.06% 0.08% VYM (-0.02%)
5-Year Annual Return 10.8% 9.2% VYM (+1.6%)
Number of Holdings 450+ 75 VYM (More Diversified)
Assets Under Management $56.3B $8.4B VYM
P/E Ratio 14.8 16.2 VYM (Cheaper)
Beta vs S&P 500 0.88 0.70 HDV (Lower Risk)
Maximum Drawdown (2020) -25% -18% HDV (Better Protection)

Performance Comparison

VYM Performance

Higher total returns with slightly lower yield. More diversified with 450+ holdings. Higher beta (0.88) means more market-like returns. Better performance during bull markets and value rallies. Lower expense ratio advantage.

10.8%
5-Year Return
3.1%
Yield
450+
Holdings
0.88
Beta

HDV Performance

Higher current yield with lower total returns. More concentrated with 75 holdings. Much lower beta (0.70) provides defensive characteristics. Better performance during bear markets and recessions. Higher yield from quality screens.

9.2%
5-Year Return
3.8%
Yield
75
Holdings
0.70
Beta

Strategy Analysis

VYM Approach

Broad high yield focus:

  • FTSE High Dividend Yield Index
  • Above-average dividend yield companies
  • No minimum quality or growth requirements
  • Broad diversification (450+ holdings)
  • Market-cap weighted within yield screen
  • Value-oriented portfolio
  • Pure yield maximization approach
  • Vanguard low-cost structure

HDV Approach

Quality high yield focus:

  • Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index
  • Positive earnings requirement
  • Positive cash flow requirement
  • Sustainable payout ratio screens
  • Concentrated portfolio (75 holdings)
  • Defensive sector overweight
  • Quality before yield maximization
  • iShares Core series structure

Provider & Structure Comparison

Vanguard vs iShares: Different approaches to high dividend investing with distinct structural advantages.

Vanguard Advantages

0.06%
Lower Expense Ratio

iShares Advantages

3.8%
Higher Current Yield

Diversification

450+ vs 75
VYM vs HDV Holdings

Risk Reduction

-0.18 Beta
HDV Lower Market Risk

Quality & Defensive Characteristics

HDV's quality screens result in more defensive portfolio with lower beta and better downside protection. VYM offers broader diversification but includes some riskier high-yield companies.

HDV Quality Screens

Positive earnings: Excludes unprofitable companies

Positive cash flow: Ensures dividend sustainability

Payout ratio: Focuses on sustainable dividends

Financial health: Emphasizes stable companies

VYM Yield Focus

No earnings requirement: Includes some unprofitable

No cash flow requirement: Some unsustainable yields

Yield maximization: Prioritizes highest yields

Broader approach: Less screening, more holdings

Defensive Performance

2008 Crisis: HDV -30% vs VYM -38%

2020 Crash: HDV -18% vs VYM -25%

Dividend cuts 2020: HDV 5% vs VYM 8%

Recovery: HDV slower but less volatile

Defensive Characteristics

Downside Protection Comparison

HDV's lower beta (0.70 vs 0.88) and quality screens provide better downside protection during market declines. VYM's higher beta means it falls more but also rises more during recoveries.

Beta Comparison

0.70 vs 0.88
HDV vs VYM

Max Drawdown (2020)

-18% vs -25%
HDV vs VYM

Volatility (5-Year)

14% vs 16%
HDV vs VYM

Sharpe Ratio

0.65 vs 0.68
HDV vs VYM

Portfolio Concentration Analysis

VYM's broad diversification vs HDV's concentrated approach creates different risk profiles and performance characteristics.

VYM Diversification

450+ holdings: Very broad diversification

Top 10 holdings: ~25% of portfolio

Sector balance: More balanced exposure

Single stock risk: Very low (max ~4%)

HDV Concentration

75 holdings: Moderately concentrated

Top 10 holdings: ~40% of portfolio

Sector tilt: Defensive overweight

Single stock risk: Moderate (max ~8%)

Implications

VYM: More index-like, lower single stock risk

HDV: More active-like, higher stock picking

Diversification: VYM better for risk reduction

Concentration: HDV can amplify quality premium

Income Analysis

VYM Income Profile

Moderate current yield with broader diversification. Higher total returns but more volatility. Lower yield due to broader market exposure. Better for investors wanting market-like returns with enhanced income.

Current Yield 3.1%
5-Year Dividend Growth 5.2%
Yield on Cost (5-Year) ~4.0%
Dividend Safety Medium

HDV Income Profile

Higher current yield with defensive characteristics. Lower total returns but better downside protection. Higher yield from quality screens and defensive tilt. Better for income-focused investors prioritizing stability.

Current Yield 3.8%
5-Year Dividend Growth 4.5%
Yield on Cost (5-Year) ~4.8%
Dividend Safety High

Sector Allocation Comparison

VYM Sectors (Balanced High Yield)

Financials 21.5%
Healthcare 16.2%
Consumer Staples 14.8%
Information Technology 11.2%
Energy 9.5%

HDV Sectors (Defensive High Yield)

Healthcare 28.5%
Consumer Staples 22.3%
Energy 18.2%
Utilities 12.5%
Financials 8.8%

Top Holdings Comparison

VYM Top Holdings (Broad High Yield)

JPMorgan Chase & Co. 3.8%
Johnson & Johnson 3.5%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 3.2%
Procter & Gamble Co. 2.8%
Verizon Communications 2.5%

Note: More diversified, lower individual weights

HDV Top Holdings (Concentrated Quality)

Exxon Mobil Corp. 8.2%
Johnson & Johnson 7.5%
Pfizer Inc. 6.8%
Procter & Gamble Co. 6.2%
Chevron Corp. 5.8%

Note: More concentrated, higher individual weights

Investment Recommendation

🎯 Choose VYM If:

  • Higher total returns are priority (10.8% vs 9.2%)
  • You prefer broader diversification (450+ vs 75 holdings)
  • Lower expense ratio matters (0.06% vs 0.08%)
  • You want more market-like returns (beta 0.88 vs 0.70)
  • You're in accumulation phase
  • You believe in Vanguard's low-cost approach
  • You want more balanced sector exposure
  • Lower single stock concentration preferred

🛡️ Choose HDV If:

  • Higher current yield is critical (3.8% vs 3.1%)
  • Downside protection matters (beta 0.70 vs 0.88)
  • You're in or near retirement
  • Defensive characteristics are important
  • Quality screens provide comfort
  • You want more concentrated high-conviction portfolio
  • Bear market protection is a priority
  • You prefer iShares' quality-focused approach

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For balanced approach: Consider 60% VYM + 40% HDV. This provides ~3.4% yield with moderate risk. For retirees: 40% VYM + 60% HDV provides ~3.5% yield with good downside protection. For accumulators: 80% VYM + 20% HDV maximizes growth with some income. Important: HDV's concentration (75 holdings) vs VYM's diversification (450+) creates different risk profiles. Consider complementary pairing: Use VYM for growth and diversification, HDV for income and defense. For maximum income with protection: 50% HDV + 25% VYM + 25% bonds. During bull markets, overweight VYM. During uncertainty, overweight HDV. Both are excellent high-yield options - choose based on your risk tolerance and time horizon.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: VYM vs HDV?

VYM
Choose VYM if you want a higher current yield than SCHD from a very broad basket of large-cap U.S. payers.
HDV
Choose HDV if you want high current income from a concentrated set of high-quality, higher-yielding names.
Bottom line: Both VYM and HDV are high-yield income funds, so the decision comes down to the finer details — expense ratio, exact holdings, yield and dividend-growth rate. Compare the figures in the table above and pick the one whose costs and composition fit your plan.