DGRO vs SPYD: Growth vs High Yield Dividend Battle

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs SPDR S&P 500 High Dividend ETF. Should you prioritize dividend growth or maximum current yield?

DGRO

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

2.35%
Dividend Yield
0.08%
Expense Ratio
10.5%
5-Year Return
418
Holdings

DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, selecting companies with at least 5 consecutive years of dividend growth and sustainable payout ratios. Market-cap weighted with quality screens. Focuses on consistent dividend growers with financial health.

Dividend Growth Quality Screened Low Cost Market-Cap Weighted Sustainable Payouts
SPYD

SPYD

SPDR S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

4.35%
Dividend Yield
0.07%
Expense Ratio
8.6%
5-Year Return
80
Holdings

SPYD tracks the S&P 500 High Dividend Index, selecting the 80 highest-yielding S&P 500 stocks. Equal-weighted methodology reduces concentration. Pure yield-focused strategy without quality screens. Higher yield but potentially higher risk profile.

High Yield Equal Weighted S&P 500 Only Yield Focused Quarterly Income

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric DGRO SPYD Winner
Dividend Yield 2.35% 4.35% SPYD (+2.00%)
Expense Ratio 0.08% 0.07% SPYD (-0.01%)
5-Year Annual Return 10.5% 8.6% DGRO (+1.9%)
Number of Holdings 418 80 DGRO (5.2x more)
Assets Under Management $28.4B $6.8B DGRO
P/E Ratio 19.5 12.8 SPYD (cheaper)
Price/Book Ratio 3.2 2.1 SPYD (cheaper)
Beta vs S&P 500 0.85 0.82 SPYD (lower risk)

Performance Comparison

DGRO Performance

Lower yield with stronger total returns. Quality-focused dividend growth strategy. Market-cap weighted with growth exposure. Better long-term performance through dividend growth compounding. More growth-oriented with technology exposure. Outperforms in growth markets.

10.5%
5-Year Return
2.35%
Yield
0.85
Beta
418
Holdings

SPYD Performance

High yield with lower total returns. Pure yield-focused equal-weighted strategy. Value-oriented with high dividend payers. Better current income but lower growth potential. More defensive during certain markets. Outperforms in value/income-focused periods.

8.6%
5-Year Return
4.35%
Yield
0.82
Beta
80
Holdings

Strategy Analysis

DGRO Approach

Dividend growth quality strategy:

  • Tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index
  • Minimum 5 consecutive years of dividend growth
  • Maximum 75% payout ratio requirement
  • Market-cap weighted methodology
  • Quality screens for sustainable dividends
  • Growth and quality emphasis
  • Broad diversification (418 holdings)
  • Dividend growth over yield focus

SPYD Approach

High yield dividend strategy:

  • Tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index
  • Selects 80 highest-yielding S&P 500 stocks
  • Equal-weighted methodology (each ~1.25%)
  • No quality screens beyond S&P 500 membership
  • Pure yield maximization strategy
  • Quarterly rebalancing
  • Value and income focus
  • Current yield over growth priority

Growth vs Yield Trade-off Analysis

DGRO's growth focus vs SPYD's yield focus creates dramatically different investment outcomes.

Yield Difference

2.00% Gap
SPYD vs DGRO Advantage

Return Difference

1.9% Gap
DGRO vs SPYD Advantage

Dividend Growth (5-Yr)

8.2% vs 3.8%
DGRO vs SPYD CAGR

Total Return Projection

Higher vs Lower
DGRO vs SPYD (10-Yr)

Methodology & Construction Differences

DGRO's quality growth screens vs SPYD's pure yield approach creates different portfolio characteristics.

Weighting Methodology

DGRO: Market-cap weighted (tech/growth heavy)

SPYD: Equal-weighted (value/income heavy)

Concentration Risk: DGRO higher (mega-caps), SPYD lower

Top 10 Holdings %: DGRO 35% vs SPYD 13%

Quality Requirements

DGRO Screens: 5+ year growth, payout ratio <75%

SPYD Screens: None beyond S&P 500, yield ranking

Dividend Sustainability: DGRO higher, SPYD lower

Growth Expectations: DGRO explicit, SPYD none

Portfolio Characteristics

Average Market Cap: DGRO $350B vs SPYD $85B

Style Exposure: DGRO growth, SPYD value

Sector Diversification: SPYD better (equal-weight)

Turnover: DGRO ~15%, SPYD ~40%

Quality & Fundamental Characteristics

DGRO's quality screens result in superior fundamentals despite SPYD's attractive valuation.

Return on Equity

26% vs 18%
DGRO vs SPYD

Debt/Equity Ratio

58% vs 75%
DGRO vs SPYD

Profit Margin

20% vs 12%
DGRO vs SPYD

Dividend Coverage Ratio

2.8x vs 1.5x
DGRO vs SPYD

Risk & Sector Exposure Comparison

DGRO's growth tilt vs SPYD's value tilt creates different risk exposures and market correlations.

Sector Allocation

Technology: DGRO 24% vs SPYD 8%

Financials: DGRO 16% vs SPYD 22%

Real Estate: DGRO 3% vs SPYD 25%

Utilities: DGRO 5% vs SPYD 18%

Risk Metrics

Standard Deviation: DGRO 14.8% vs SPYD 16.2%

Maximum Drawdown (2020): DGRO -34% vs SPYD -38%

Downside Capture: DGRO 92% vs SPYD 95%

Dividend Cut Risk: DGRO low, SPYD moderate-high

Market Correlation

Growth Market Correlation: DGRO high, SPYD low

Value Market Correlation: DGRO low, SPYD high

Interest Rate Sensitivity: DGRO lower, SPYD higher

Inflation Protection: SPYD better (real assets)

Income Analysis

DGRO Income Profile

Moderate yield with strong growth potential. Quality-focused companies with growing dividends. Lower current income but higher future income through growth. More sustainable payout ratios. Better inflation protection through growth. Ideal for accumulation phase.

Current Yield 2.35%
5-Year Dividend Growth 8.2%
Payout Ratio 45%
Income Growth Potential High

SPYD Income Profile

High current yield with modest growth. Value-oriented companies paying high dividends. Maximum current income for near-term needs. Higher yield but lower growth potential. Good for immediate income requirements. Higher dividend cut risk during downturns.

Current Yield 4.35%
5-Year Dividend Growth 3.8%
Payout Ratio 62%
Current Income Generation High

Historical Performance & Backtesting

Long-Term Performance Comparison

DGRO has significantly outperformed SPYD historically despite lower yield, thanks to dividend growth compounding and quality focus.

Since 2014 (DGRO inception)

10.5% vs 8.6%
DGRO vs SPYD Annualized

Maximum Drawdown (2020)

-34% vs -38%
DGRO vs SPYD

Sharpe Ratio

0.68 vs 0.52
DGRO vs SPYD

Dividend Growth (5-Year)

8.2% vs 3.8%
DGRO vs SPYD CAGR

Top Holdings Comparison

DGRO Top Holdings (Growth & Quality Focus)

Microsoft Corp. (Technology) 5.8%
Apple Inc. (Technology) 5.2%
Johnson & Johnson (Healthcare) 3.5%
JPMorgan Chase (Financials) 3.2%
UnitedHealth Group (Healthcare) 2.8%

Note: Market-cap weighted, 418 holdings, growth/quality tilt, tech heavy

SPYD Top Holdings (Equal-Weighted High Yield)

Ford Motor Co. (Consumer) 1.3%
Iron Mountain (Real Estate) 1.3%
Valero Energy (Energy) 1.3%
Altria Group (Staples) 1.3%
Simon Property Group (Real Estate) 1.2%

Note: Equal-weighted, 80 holdings, REIT heavy, pure yield focus

Investment Recommendation

🌱 Choose DGRO If:

  • Dividend growth is priority over current yield
  • You're in accumulation phase building wealth
  • Quality and sustainability matter most
  • Higher total returns are more important than income
  • You want growth exposure with dividend growth
  • Technology and healthcare sector exposure appeals
  • Lower dividend cut risk during downturns matters
  • Long-term compounding is your goal

💰 Choose SPYD If:

  • Maximum current yield is primary goal (4.35% vs 2.35%)
  • You're in or near retirement needing income
  • Equal-weight diversification appeals to you
  • Value and real estate exposure is preferred
  • Current income needs outweigh growth concerns
  • Lower expense ratio matters (0.07% vs 0.08%)
  • You're comfortable with higher dividend cut risk
  • Quarterly high income is immediate priority

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For balanced total return: Use DGRO as core (70-80%) with SPYD satellite (20-30%) for income boost. For maximum income focus: Use SPYD as core (60-70%) with DGRO satellite (30-40%) for growth anchor. For phased approach: Start with DGRO in accumulation, transition to SPYD in retirement. For blended strategy: 50% DGRO + 50% SPYD provides ~3.35% blended yield with growth/income balance. Important: DGRO's 0.08% vs SPYD's 0.07% expense ratios are nearly identical. DGRO's growth focus should outperform long-term. SPYD's equal-weighting provides better diversification. During growth/tech leadership, DGRO significantly outperforms. During value/income markets, SPYD may provide better yields. Consider lifecycle strategy: 100% DGRO age 20-50, 70% DGRO/30% SPYD age 50-65, 50/50 in retirement.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: DGRO vs SPYD?

DGRO
Choose DGRO if you want broad, low-cost exposure to companies with consistent dividend-growth histories, with a slightly lower yield than SCHD but more holdings.
SPYD
Choose SPYD if you want maximum current income from the highest-yielding S&P 500 stocks held in equal weight.
Bottom line: SPYD pays more income today, while DGRO pays less now but has historically grown its dividend faster and screens harder for quality. If current yield matters most, lean SPYD; if a growing, durable income stream matters more, lean DGRO.