SDY vs DIV: S&P Dividend vs SuperDividend

SPDR S&P Dividend ETF vs Global X SuperDividend ETF. Should you choose quality S&P dividend stocks or maximum global yield?

SDY

SDY

SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

2.8%
Dividend Yield
0.35%
Expense Ratio
9.2%
5-Year Return
121
Holdings

SDY tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, selecting companies with at least 20 consecutive years of dividend increases. Focuses on dividend longevity and sustainability. Market-cap weighted with quality screens for consistent dividend payers.

Dividend Aristocrats 20+ Year History Quality Focus US Large-Cap Dividend Growth
DIV

DIV

Global X SuperDividend ETF

7.2%
Dividend Yield
0.58%
Expense Ratio
5.8%
5-Year Return
100
Holdings

DIV tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, selecting 100 highest-yielding stocks globally with sustainable dividends. Equal-weighted methodology with global diversification. Focuses on maximum current yield from various sectors and regions.

SuperDividend Global Focus High Yield Monthly Dividends Equal Weighted

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric SDY DIV Winner
Dividend Yield 2.8% 7.2% DIV (+4.4%)
Expense Ratio 0.35% 0.58% SDY (-0.23%)
5-Year Annual Return 9.2% 5.8% SDY (+3.4%)
Number of Holdings 121 100 SDY (21 more)
Assets Under Management $22.3B $1.8B SDY
P/E Ratio 17.5 11.2 DIV (cheaper)
Price/Book Ratio 2.8 1.5 DIV (cheaper)
Dividend Frequency Quarterly Monthly DIV (monthly)

Performance Comparison

SDY Performance

Moderate yield with strong total returns. Quality-focused dividend aristocrats strategy. Tracks companies with 20+ years of dividend growth. Better long-term performance through dividend growth compounding. More stable and defensive during downturns. Outperforms in quality-focused markets.

9.2%
5-Year Return
2.8%
Yield
0.89
Beta
121
Holdings

DIV Performance

Very high yield with lower total returns. Global high-yield equal-weighted strategy. Maximum current income focus with monthly distributions. Better for immediate income needs but lower growth potential. More volatile but provides higher current yield. Outperforms in yield-focused periods.

5.8%
5-Year Return
7.2%
Yield
1.12
Beta
100
Holdings

Strategy Analysis

SDY Approach

Dividend aristocrats quality strategy:

  • Tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index
  • Minimum 20 consecutive years of dividend increases
  • Market-cap weighted methodology
  • US-only focus with large-cap emphasis
  • Quality screens for dividend sustainability
  • Dividend growth and stability focus
  • Quarterly dividend payments
  • Conservative dividend payout ratios

DIV Approach

Global superdividend strategy:

  • Tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index
  • Selects 100 highest-yielding stocks globally
  • Equal-weighted methodology (each ~1%)
  • Global diversification (US, Europe, Asia)
  • Maximum yield focus with sustainability screens
  • Monthly dividend payments
  • High current income priority
  • Quarterly rebalancing

Yield vs Growth Trade-off Analysis

SDY's quality growth focus vs DIV's maximum yield focus creates dramatically different investment outcomes.

Yield Difference

4.4% Gap
DIV vs SDY Advantage

Return Difference

3.4% Gap
SDY vs DIV Advantage

Dividend Growth (5-Yr)

6.5% vs 2.8%
SDY vs DIV CAGR

Volatility Comparison

Lower vs Higher
SDY vs DIV Risk

Methodology & Construction Differences

SDY's US aristocrats focus vs DIV's global yield approach creates different portfolio characteristics.

Geographic Focus

SDY: 100% United States (large-cap)

DIV: 40% US, 30% Europe, 20% Asia, 10% Other

Currency Risk: SDY none, DIV moderate

Political Risk: SDY low, DIV moderate-high

Quality Requirements

SDY Screens: 20+ year growth, S&P 500 eligible

DIV Screens: Yield ranking, sustainability tests

Dividend Sustainability: SDY very high, DIV moderate

Cut Risk: SDY very low, DIV moderate-high

Portfolio Characteristics

Average Market Cap: SDY $85B vs DIV $25B

Style Exposure: SDY value, DIV yield-focused

Sector Diversification: DIV better (global)

Turnover: SDY ~15%, DIV ~35%

Quality & Fundamental Characteristics

SDY's aristocrats screens result in superior fundamentals despite DIV's attractive yield.

Dividend Growth Streak

25+ vs 5+ years
SDY vs DIV Average

Payout Ratio

48% vs 75%
SDY vs DIV

Return on Equity

22% vs 15%
SDY vs DIV

Debt/Equity Ratio

65% vs 85%
SDY vs DIV

Risk & Sector Exposure Comparison

SDY's US focus vs DIV's global exposure creates different risk profiles and market correlations.

Sector Allocation

Financials: SDY 22% vs DIV 28%

Utilities: SDY 15% vs DIV 12%

Real Estate: SDY 8% vs DIV 25%

Energy: SDY 5% vs DIV 18%

Risk Metrics

Standard Deviation: SDY 14.5% vs DIV 18.2%

Maximum Drawdown (2020): SDY -32% vs DIV -45%

Downside Capture: SDY 90% vs DIV 105%

Dividend Cut Risk: SDY very low, DIV moderate-high

Market Correlation

US Market Correlation: SDY high, DIV moderate

Global Market Correlation: SDY low, DIV high

Interest Rate Sensitivity: SDY moderate, DIV high

Currency Risk: SDY none, DIV moderate

Income Analysis

SDY Income Profile

Moderate yield with excellent growth history. Dividend aristocrats with 20+ years of increases. Lower current income but highly predictable growth. Very sustainable payout ratios. Better inflation protection through growth. Ideal for long-term income growth.

Current Yield 2.8%
5-Year Dividend Growth 6.5%
Payout Ratio 48%
Dividend Safety Score A+

DIV Income Profile

Very high current yield with modest growth. Global high-yield companies paying maximum dividends. Monthly income distribution for cash flow needs. Higher yield but lower growth potential. Good for immediate income requirements. Higher dividend cut risk during global downturns.

Current Yield 7.2%
5-Year Dividend Growth 2.8%
Payout Ratio 75%
Payment Frequency Monthly

Historical Performance & Backtesting

Long-Term Performance Comparison

SDY has significantly outperformed DIV historically despite lower yield, thanks to dividend growth compounding and quality focus.

Since 2005 (SDY inception)

9.2% vs 5.8%
SDY vs DIV Annualized

Maximum Drawdown (2020)

-32% vs -45%
SDY vs DIV

Sharpe Ratio

0.62 vs 0.38
SDY vs DIV

Dividend Growth (10-Year)

6.5% vs 2.8%
SDY vs DIV CAGR

Top Holdings Comparison

SDY Top Holdings (Dividend Aristocrats)

AbbVie Inc. (Healthcare) 3.2%
Exxon Mobil Corp. (Energy) 3.1%
Johnson & Johnson (Healthcare) 2.9%
Chevron Corp. (Energy) 2.8%
Procter & Gamble (Staples) 2.7%

Note: Market-cap weighted, 121 holdings, 20+ year dividend growers, US focus

DIV Top Holdings (Global High Yield)

British American Tobacco (UK) 1.1%
AT&T Inc. (US Telecom) 1.1%
Vodafone Group (UK Telecom) 1.0%
Energy Transfer LP (US Energy) 1.0%
Mitsubishi UFJ (Japan Financials) 1.0%

Note: Equal-weighted, 100 holdings, global diversification, monthly income

Investment Recommendation

👑 Choose SDY If:

  • Dividend safety and growth history are priorities
  • You prefer US-focused, large-cap quality companies
  • Lower expense ratio matters (0.35% vs 0.58%)
  • Higher total returns are more important than yield
  • You want proven dividend growers (20+ year streak)
  • Lower volatility and drawdowns are important
  • Quarterly dividends align with your cash flow needs
  • Long-term wealth building is your primary goal

🌍 Choose DIV If:

  • Maximum current yield is primary goal (7.2% vs 2.8%)
  • You're in or near retirement needing high income
  • Monthly dividend payments are preferred
  • Global diversification appeals to you
  • Current income needs outweigh growth concerns
  • You're comfortable with higher volatility
  • Currency diversification is desired
  • You can tolerate higher dividend cut risk

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For balanced total return: Use SDY as core (70-80%) with DIV satellite (20-30%) for income boost. For maximum income focus: Use DIV as core (60-70%) with SDY satellite (30-40%) for stability anchor. For phased approach: Start with SDY in accumulation, transition to DIV in retirement. For blended strategy: 50% SDY + 50% DIV provides ~5.0% blended yield with growth/income balance. Important: SDY's lower expense ratio (0.35% vs 0.58%) adds to returns. SDY's quality focus should outperform long-term. DIV's global diversification provides currency exposure. During US market leadership, SDY significantly outperforms. During global yield-focused markets, DIV may provide better income. Consider lifecycle strategy: 100% SDY age 20-50, 70% SDY/30% DIV age 50-65, 50/50 in retirement with monthly income from DIV.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: SDY vs DIV?

SDY
Choose SDY if you want long-streak dividend raisers (20+ years) weighted toward higher yield than NOBL.
DIV
Choose DIV if you want a very high headline yield and accept the higher risk that comes with it.
Bottom line: DIV pays more income today, while SDY pays less now but has historically grown its dividend faster and screens harder for quality. If current yield matters most, lean DIV; if a growing, durable income stream matters more, lean SDY.