VOO vs IVW: S&P 500 vs S&P 500 Growth

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF. Compare the traditional market benchmark against its growth-focused variant from the S&P 500 style indexes.

VOO

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

0.03%
Expense Ratio
1.5%
Dividend Yield
12.8%
10-Year Return
503
Holdings

VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index, providing broad exposure to 500 of the largest U.S. companies across all sectors. With an ultra-low 0.03% expense ratio, it's the most cost-effective way to own the entire S&P 500. The fund represents the market-cap weighted benchmark of U.S. large-cap stocks, offering balanced exposure to growth and value styles, all sectors, and the full breadth of the U.S. large-cap market. Perfect for investors wanting pure market exposure with maximum cost efficiency.

S&P 500 Ultra-Low Cost Market Benchmark Diversified Vanguard
IVW

IVW

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF

0.18%
Expense Ratio
1.0%
Dividend Yield
14.2%
10-Year Return
231
Growth Stocks

IVW tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index, which includes S&P 500 companies exhibiting strong growth characteristics. The index selects stocks based on three growth factors: sales growth, earnings growth to price ratio, and momentum. This creates a portfolio tilted toward companies with higher growth potential, primarily in technology, consumer discretionary, and healthcare sectors. IVW offers a pure growth style exposure while maintaining the large-cap quality and liquidity of the S&P 500 universe.

S&P 500 Growth Growth Factor Style Tilt Tech-Heavy iShares

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric VOO (S&P 500) IVW (S&P 500 Growth) Winner
Expense Ratio 0.03% 0.18% VOO (0.03%)
Dividend Yield 1.5% 1.0% VOO (+0.5%)
10-Year Annual Return 12.8% 14.2% IVW (+1.4%)
Number of Holdings 503 231 VOO (More diversified)
Technology Allocation 28% 45% IVW (Growth tilt)
P/E Ratio 22.8 28.5 VOO (Better valuation)
Price/Book Ratio 4.5 7.2 VOO (Better valuation)
10-Year Volatility 15.2% 16.8% VOO (Lower volatility)
Maximum Drawdown (2022) -25% -30% VOO (Better protection)
Top 10 Concentration 30.2% 45.8% VOO (Better diversified)
Portfolio Turnover 3% 15% VOO (Lower turnover)
Assets Under Management $950B $35B VOO (More established)

Performance Comparison

VOO Performance Profile

Pure market benchmark returns reflecting the collective performance of U.S. large-cap stocks. Balanced exposure to both growth and value styles provides steady returns across market cycles. Lower volatility due to diversified sector exposure and inclusion of stable value stocks. Higher dividend yield from exposure to dividend-paying value stocks. Excellent long-term track record as the market benchmark. Tends to perform well during value-led markets and periods of rising dividends. More defensive during market corrections due to value stock exposure.

12.8%
10-Year Return
1.5%
Dividend Yield
15.2%
Volatility
-25%
2022 Drawdown

IVW Performance Profile

Higher long-term returns driven by growth stock outperformance over the last decade. Strong performance during growth-led bull markets and technological innovation cycles. Higher volatility due to growth stock concentration and higher valuations. Lower dividend yield as growth companies reinvest earnings rather than pay dividends. Tends to outperform during periods of economic expansion and low interest rates. More sensitive to interest rate changes and growth stock valuations. Higher potential returns but with greater risk during growth stock corrections.

14.2%
10-Year Return
1.0%
Dividend Yield
16.8%
Volatility
-30%
2022 Drawdown

Strategy & Style Analysis

VOO: Market Benchmark Strategy

Pure S&P 500 market exposure:

  • Tracks S&P 500 Index (500 largest U.S. companies)
  • Market-cap weighted (larger companies have larger weights)
  • Ultra-low 0.03% expense ratio
  • Balanced growth/value exposure (50/50 split)
  • Broad sector diversification
  • Top 10 holdings: 30.2% concentration
  • Technology: 28% (market weight)
  • Financials: 13% (market weight)
  • Healthcare: 13% (market weight)
  • Passive with minimal turnover (3%)

IVW: Growth Style Strategy

S&P 500 growth factor exposure:

  • Tracks S&P 500 Growth Index (growth stocks from S&P 500)
  • Growth factor screening (sales growth, earnings/price, momentum)
  • 231 holdings (growth subset of S&P 500)
  • Concentrated in growth sectors
  • Technology: 45% (overweight)
  • Consumer Discretionary: 18% (overweight)
  • Healthcare: 15% (slight overweight)
  • Financials: 5% (underweight)
  • Energy/Utilities: Minimal (underweight)
  • Higher turnover (15%) due to style rebalancing

Growth vs Value Style Analysis

VOO provides balanced exposure while IVW tilts heavily toward growth characteristics:

VOO Style Characteristics

Growth/Value Balance 50% Growth / 50% Value
Valuation (P/E) 22.8 (Market Average)
Dividend Focus Balanced
Earnings Growth Market Average
Revenue Growth Market Average
Price Momentum Market Average

IVW Style Characteristics

Growth/Value Balance 100% Growth / 0% Value
Valuation (P/E) 28.5 (Premium)
Dividend Focus Low (Growth Focus)
Earnings Growth High (+20% vs Market)
Revenue Growth High (+15% vs Market)
Price Momentum Strong (Growth Premium)

Market Cycle Performance

Growth Bull Markets: IVW tends to outperform significantly

Value Recoveries: VOO performs better

Market Corrections: VOO has better downside protection

Interest Rate Hikes: VOO less sensitive

Economic Expansions: IVW benefits more

Recession Periods: VOO more defensive

Holdings & Sector Analysis

VOO Top Holdings (Market Weight)

Apple 7.2%
Microsoft 6.8%
Amazon 3.5%
NVIDIA 3.2%
Alphabet (Google) 2.2%
Berkshire Hathaway 1.8%

Note: Market-cap weighted, includes both growth and value stocks across all sectors

IVW Top Holdings (Growth Tilt)

Apple 12.5%
Microsoft 11.8%
Amazon 7.2%
NVIDIA 6.5%
Tesla 4.2%
Meta Platforms 3.8%

Note: Growth-tilted, higher concentration in mega-cap growth stocks

VOO Sector Allocation

Technology 28%
Healthcare 13%
Financials 13%
Consumer Discretionary 10%
Industrials 8%
Other Sectors 28%

IVW Sector Allocation

Technology 45%
Healthcare 15%
Consumer Discretionary 18%
Financials 5%
Communication Services 8%
Other Sectors 9%

Risk & Cost Analysis

VOO Risk Profile

Volatility (10-Year) 15.2%
Maximum Drawdown (2022) -25%
Beta (vs S&P 500) 1.00
Sharpe Ratio (10-Year) 0.80
Expense Ratio 0.03%
10-Year Cost on $10K $34

Key Risk Factors: Market risk, large-cap concentration, U.S. economic risk. Cost Advantage: Ultra-low 0.03% expense ratio provides significant long-term cost savings.

IVW Risk Profile

Volatility (10-Year) 16.8%
Maximum Drawdown (2022) -30%
Beta (vs S&P 500) 1.10
Sharpe Ratio (10-Year) 0.85
Expense Ratio 0.18%
10-Year Cost on $10K $203

Key Risk Factors: Growth stock risk, valuation risk, sector concentration, interest rate sensitivity. Cost Consideration: 0.18% expense ratio is competitive but 6x higher than VOO.

Cost Analysis: Long-Term Impact

VOO's 0.03% expense ratio provides a significant cost advantage. On a $100,000 investment over 20 years, assuming 8% annual returns:
VOO total cost: ~$680
IVW total cost: ~$4,080
Cost difference: ~$3,400 saved with VOO
However, IVW's 1.4% higher annual return over the last decade would have generated approximately $32,000 more on the same investment, potentially justifying the higher cost for growth investors.

Investor Use Cases & Scenarios

When VOO Excels

Core Portfolio Holding: As the foundation of a diversified portfolio

Cost-Conscious Investors: Wanting ultra-low expense ratio (0.03%)

Market Benchmark Seekers: Wanting pure S&P 500 exposure

Balanced Style Exposure: Wanting both growth and value stocks

Risk-Averse Investors: Preferring lower volatility and drawdowns

Dividend Investors: Wanting higher dividend yield (1.5%)

Long-Term Buy & Hold: Maximum cost efficiency over decades

Taxable Accounts: Benefit from tax efficiency and low turnover

When IVW Excels

Growth-Oriented Investors: Wanting growth stock exposure

Performance Seekers: Prioritizing higher returns over costs

Growth Style Tilt: As a growth complement to value holdings

Technology Believers: Wanting tech-heavy exposure (45%)

Tactical Allocation: During growth-led market cycles

Younger Investors: Longer time horizon for growth compounding

Growth Bull Markets: When growth stocks are leading

Satellite Position: As a growth satellite to a core portfolio

Investment Recommendation

📊 Choose VOO If:

  • You want pure S&P 500 market exposure
  • Ultra-low cost is your top priority (0.03%)
  • You prefer balanced growth/value exposure
  • You want higher dividend yield (1.5%)
  • You're building a core portfolio foundation
  • You prefer lower volatility and better downside protection
  • You're cost-conscious for long-term compounding
  • You want maximum diversification across all sectors

🚀 Choose IVW If:

  • You want growth stock exposure within S&P 500
  • Higher returns are more important than lowest cost
  • You believe growth will continue outperforming value
  • You want concentrated tech exposure (45%)
  • You're adding growth tilt to your portfolio
  • You have a longer investment horizon (10+ years)
  • You're comfortable with higher volatility and drawdowns
  • You want tactical growth exposure during expansion cycles

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For most investors: VOO as core holding provides optimal balance. For growth tilt: Use IVW as 20-30% of equity allocation. For cost optimization: VOO's 0.03% is unbeatable for core exposure. For performance seeking: IVW's 1.4% higher historical returns may justify higher cost. For balanced approach: 70% VOO + 30% IVW captures growth while maintaining core. For risk management: VOO provides better diversification and downside protection. For tax efficiency: Both are tax-efficient ETFs, but VOO's lower turnover may provide slight edge. For retirement accounts: Consider IVW in Roth IRA for tax-free growth compounding.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: VOO vs IVW?

VOO
Choose VOO if you want rock-bottom-cost (0.03%) S&P 500 exposure for long-term, hands-off growth.
IVW
Choose IVW if you want the growth half of the S&P 500.
Bottom line: IVW concentrates in faster-growing companies for higher potential returns and higher volatility, while VOO spreads risk across the broader market for steadier, more diversified exposure. Many investors hold VOO as a core and add IVW for extra growth tilt.