JEPI vs NUSI: Active Income with Different Risk Management

JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF vs Nationwide Nasdaq-100 Risk-Managed Income ETF. Compare active options strategies with different approaches to risk and income generation.

JEPI

JEPI

JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF

7.9%
Distribution Yield
0.35%
Expense Ratio
8.2%
Since 2020 Return
~130
Holdings

JEPI combines equity exposure with an actively managed covered call strategy on the S&P 500. It holds a diversified portfolio of large-cap US stocks and sells out-of-the-money call options to generate income. The active management allows for strategic option writing based on market conditions, volatility, and individual stock characteristics. Aims to provide consistent monthly income with reduced volatility compared to the S&P 500 while maintaining substantial upside participation.

Active Options S&P 500 Low Volatility Monthly Income JPMorgan
NUSI

NUSI

Nationwide Nasdaq-100 Risk-Managed Income ETF

11.8%
Distribution Yield
0.68%
Expense Ratio
-2.5%
Since 2019 Return
~100
Holdings (Nasdaq)

NUSI employs a "collar strategy" on the Nasdaq 100, combining covered calls for income generation with protective puts for downside protection. It holds Nasdaq 100 stocks, sells covered calls for income, and buys protective puts to limit downside risk. This creates a defined risk/return profile with capped upside and limited downside. Designed for investors seeking high income from tech exposure with built-in crash protection, though at the cost of higher expenses and lower total returns.

Collar Strategy Nasdaq 100 Crash Protection High Income Defined Risk

Key Metrics Comparison

Metric JEPI NUSI Winner
Distribution Yield 7.9% 11.8% NUSI (+3.9%)
Expense Ratio 0.35% 0.68% JEPI (Lower)
Total Return (Since 2020) 8.2% -2.5% JEPI (+10.7%)
Assets Under Management $32B $1.2B JEPI (Larger)
Inception Date May 2020 Dec 2019 NUSI (Slightly older)
Beta vs Market 0.60 0.40 NUSI (Lower volatility)
Distribution Frequency Monthly Monthly Draw (Both monthly)
Tax Efficiency Mixed (ROC + Income) Poor (Significant ROC) JEPI (Better)
Upside Participation ~70-80% ~40-50% JEPI (Higher)

Performance Comparison

JEPI Performance Profile

High monthly income with reduced volatility. Active options strategy generates consistent income while providing substantial upside participation (70-80%). Lower beta (0.60) provides good downside protection. Monthly distributions allow compounding or regular withdrawals. Since inception, has delivered competitive total returns with lower drawdowns than S&P 500. Income varies with market volatility but generally stable. Better total returns than most covered call ETFs due to active management and selective option writing.

7.9%
Distribution Yield
8.2%
Since 2020 Return
0.60
Beta
-12%
2022 Drawdown

NUSI Performance Profile

Very high monthly income with crash protection. Collar strategy (covered calls + protective puts) generates high yield but severely caps upside. Lowest volatility among options ETFs (beta 0.40). Monthly distributions but negative total returns since inception. Protective puts provide downside protection but cost premium income. Struggles in bull markets due to capped upside and put costs. Excels in protecting capital during severe downturns. High expense ratio (0.68%) erodes returns.

11.8%
Distribution Yield
-2.5%
Since 2019 Return
0.40
Beta
-18%
2022 Drawdown

Strategy Analysis

JEPI Active Covered Call Approach

Active S&P 500 covered calls:

  • Holds 120-130 large-cap US stocks (low volatility focus)
  • Actively manages call option writing based on market conditions
  • Sells out-of-the-money (OTM) calls for income
  • Selective option writing - not 100% covered
  • Goal: Generate monthly income with substantial upside participation
  • Active management of strike prices and expiration dates
  • Uses ELNs (Equity Linked Notes) for enhanced income
  • JPMorgan's proprietary research guides option strategy

NUSI Collar Strategy Approach

Nasdaq 100 with protective collar:

  • Holds Nasdaq 100 stocks (100 largest non-financial Nasdaq companies)
  • Sells covered calls for income generation
  • Buys protective puts for downside protection
  • Collar strategy: Calls (income) + Puts (protection)
  • Goal: Generate high income with crash protection
  • Defined risk/return profile
  • Puts typically set at 10-15% below current prices
  • Higher expenses due to dual options strategy

Risk & Return Analysis

JEPI's active income approach vs NUSI's risk-managed collar strategy creates dramatically different risk/return profiles.

Income vs Total Returns

Current Yield: JEPI 7.9% vs NUSI 11.8%

Yield Difference: +3.9% for NUSI

Total Return: JEPI 8.2% vs NUSI -2.5%

Return Sacrifice: -10.7% for NUSI (protection cost)

Volatility Metrics

Beta: JEPI 0.60 vs NUSI 0.40

Volatility Reduction: JEPI 40% vs NUSI 60% less than market

Maximum Drawdown: JEPI -12% vs NUSI -18% (2022)

Risk-Adjusted Returns: JEPI significantly better

Market Participation

Upside Capture: JEPI ~70-80% vs NUSI ~40-50%

Downside Capture: JEPI ~50% vs NUSI ~30-40%

Bull Markets: JEPI good vs NUSI poor participation

Bear Markets: Both good, NUSI slightly better protection

Income Analysis

JEPI Income Profile

High monthly income from actively managed covered calls. 7.9% yield primarily from option premiums with some dividend contribution. Monthly distributions provide regular cash flow. Income varies with market volatility but generally stable 7-9% range. Tax treatment is mixed - some return of capital, some ordinary income. Active management can adjust income generation based on market conditions. Substantially higher total returns than other income ETFs. Good balance between income generation and capital preservation.

Distribution Yield 7.9%
Options Contribution ~6.5%
Dividend Contribution ~1.4%
Tax Efficiency Mixed

NUSI Income Profile

Very high monthly income from collar strategy. 11.8% yield primarily from covered call premiums minus put costs. Monthly distributions but negative total returns since inception. Higher yield comes at significant cost to capital. Tax treatment is poor - significant return of capital. Income can be inconsistent due to put protection costs. Highest yield among risk-managed options ETFs. Suitable only for investors prioritizing maximum current income with crash protection regardless of total returns.

Distribution Yield 11.8%
Covered Calls ~14-15% gross
Put Protection Cost ~2-3% net
Tax Efficiency Poor (ROC)

Portfolio Characteristics

JEPI Portfolio (Low Volatility + Options)

Microsoft 4.8%
Apple 4.2%
Johnson & Johnson 3.5%
Procter & Gamble 3.2%
Low Vol Focus Defensive

Note: Low volatility stocks, active options overlay, S&P 500 exposure, income focus

NUSI Portfolio (Nasdaq 100 + Collar)

Apple 12.5%
Microsoft 10.8%
Amazon 6.5%
Nvidia 5.2%
Technology Concentration 50%+

Note: Nasdaq 100 composition, collar strategy (calls + puts), high tech concentration, defined risk

Historical Performance & Market Scenarios

JEPI in Different Markets

S&P 500 Bull Markets: Captures 70-80% upside with 7.9% income

S&P 500 Bear Markets: Significant outperformance with lower beta

Sideways Markets: Excels with consistent premium collection

High Volatility: Higher premiums benefit income

Low Volatility: Lower premiums but still good yield

Tech Boom: Moderate participation due to low-vol focus

Interest Rate Changes: Moderate sensitivity

NUSI in Different Markets

Nasdaq Bull Markets: Captures only 40-50% upside despite 11.8% yield

Nasdaq Bear Markets: Excellent protection but still negative returns

Sideways Markets: Good income generation

High Volatility: Higher put costs reduce net income

Low Volatility: Lower put costs benefit net income

Tech Boom: Severely limited upside capture

Interest Rate Changes: High sensitivity (tech focus)

Options Strategy Analysis

JEPI's Active Options Strategy

Coverage Level: Selective, not 100% covered

Option Type: Out-of-the-money (OTM) covered calls

Strike Selection: Active management based on research

Expiration: Varies based on market conditions

Premium Capture: 7-9% annualized yield

Upside Sacrifice: ~20-30% capped on selected positions

Management: Active, research-driven approach

ELN Usage: Enhanced income through structured notes

NUSI's Collar Strategy Mechanics

Coverage Level: 100% covered calls + protective puts

Call Strategy: Covered calls for income

Put Strategy: Protective puts for crash protection

Net Income: Call premiums minus put costs

Protection Level: Typically 10-15% downside protection

Upside Cap: ~40-50% of Nasdaq upside

Cost Structure: High expenses (0.68%)

Risk Profile: Defined risk/return band

Investment Recommendation

🏦 Choose JEPI If:

  • You want good income (7.9%) with solid total returns
  • Monthly distributions with lower volatility appeal to you
  • You prefer active management over passive strategies
  • Substantial upside participation (70-80%) is important
  • You want S&P 500 exposure with income enhancement
  • Lower expense ratio (0.35%) matters for long-term returns
  • You accept some market risk for better total returns
  • You want JPMorgan's research-driven approach

🛡️ Choose NUSI If:

  • Maximum current income (11.8%) is your top priority
  • Crash protection is more important than total returns
  • You're extremely bearish or worried about market crashes
  • You want Nasdaq tech exposure with downside protection
  • Defined risk parameters are essential for your strategy
  • You can hold in tax-advantaged accounts (IRA/401k)
  • You accept negative total returns for high income
  • You're in retirement and need maximum cash flow

💡 Portfolio Construction Strategy

For balanced income with growth: Use JEPI as core income holding (60-70%) with growth ETFs for balance. For maximum protection with income: Small NUSI allocation (10-20%) for crash protection with other income ETFs. For tax efficiency: Hold JEPI in taxable accounts, NUSI in tax-advantaged accounts due to ROC. For income ladder: JEPI for stable monthly income, NUSI for highest yield portion. For blended approach: 75% JEPI + 25% NUSI provides ~8.9% blended yield with moderate protection. Important: NUSI's 0.68% expense ratio is nearly double JEPI's 0.35%. JEPI better for most investors seeking income with growth. NUSI only for those prioritizing crash protection over all else. During tech bull markets, JEPI significantly outperforms. During severe bear markets, NUSI provides better protection but still negative returns. Consider JEPI as primary, NUSI as satellite for specific protection needs.

Back to All ETF compare

Which should you choose: JEPI vs NUSI?

JEPI
Choose JEPI if you want high monthly income from a covered-call strategy on quality stocks and accept capped upside.
NUSI
Choose NUSI if you want option income with a protective put to cushion big drawdowns.
Bottom line: Both JEPI and NUSI are option-income funds, so the decision comes down to the finer details — expense ratio, exact holdings, yield and dividend-growth rate. Compare the figures in the table above and pick the one whose costs and composition fit your plan.